DC Metropolitan Police Department Breach Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (GOOGSMDC-APP1766375619)
The Rankiteo video explains how the company DC Metropolitan Police Department has been impacted by a Cyber Attack on the date June 04, 2025.
Incident Summary
If the player does not load, you can open the video directly.
Key Highlights From This Incident Analysis
- Timeline of DC Metropolitan Police Department's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteoโs incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts DC Metropolitan Police Department Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteoโs MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the DC Metropolitan Police Department breach identified under incident ID GOOGSMDC-APP1766375619.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of DC Metropolitan Police Department's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/dc-metropolitan-police-department, the number of followers: 7584, the industry type: Law Enforcement and the number of employees: 1319 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 686 and after the incident was 637 with a difference of -49 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on DC Metropolitan Police Department and their customers.
Apple recently reported "UK Legislators Question Apple and Google Over Lack of Smartphone Theft Protections", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
UK Members of Parliament expressed concerns that Apple and Google have not implemented measures to remotely lock, reset, and block stolen smartphones from accessing cloud services, as requested by the Metropolitan Police.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Smartphones (primarily Apple iPhones), plus an estimated financial loss of ยฃ50 million ($67 million) annual replacement value of stolen phones in London.
In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public statements by Apple and Google to UK Parliament.
The case underscores how Ongoing (policy discussion and technical evaluation), teams are taking away lessons such as Need for collaboration between tech companies, law enforcement, and regulators to address smartphone theft and resale. Potential for IMEI-based blocking systems to reduce theft incentives, and recommending next steps like Implement an international cloud-level blocking system for stolen smartphones using IMEI numbers, Establish a regulatory or government body to oversee smartphone registration and locking mechanisms and Enhance fraud detection to prevent misuse of IMEI-based blocking systems, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering UK Parliament committee urging Apple and Google to implement IMEI-based blocking for stolen devices.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including stolen devices barred from accessing Apple or Google services, and potential access to cloud services (e.g., Google Photos, Drive, iCloud). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating potential risk if data is accessed by criminals via stolen devices. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating concerns over fraud vectors like impersonation attacks leading to account deletions. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (T1048) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating stolen devices funneled through criminal networks and resold abroad (Algeria, China, Hong Kong). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources
- DC Metropolitan Police Department Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: http://www.rankiteo.com/company/dc-metropolitan-police-department/incident/GOOGSMDC-APP1766375619
- DC Metropolitan Police Department CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/dc-metropolitan-police-department
- DC Metropolitan Police Department Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/googsmdc-app1766375619-cyber-attack-june-2025/
- DC Metropolitan Police Department CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/dc-metropolitan-police-department/history
- DC Metropolitan Police Department CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.theregister.com/2025/06/04/apple_google_stolen_phones/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/static/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf





