Comparison Overview

DC Metropolitan Police Department

VS

New York City Police Department

DC Metropolitan Police Department

441 4th St NW, Washington, District of Columbia, US, 20001
Last Update: 2025-12-22
View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://joinmpd.dc.gov

As one of the top 10 largest police departments in the country, the Washington, DC Metropolitan Police Department offers opportunities you won’t find anywhere else. From leading motorcades for the President of the United States and world leaders - to joining elite investigative units, our officers are at the forefront of policing in the nation’s capital. We routinely collaborate with federal agencies and are committed to impactful community policing. Here, you’ll be part of a department that is supported by the community and driven by service.

NAICS: 92212
NAICS Definition: Police Protection
Employees: 1,319
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3
View Profile

New York City Police Department

One Police Plaza, New York, NY, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 700 and 749
http://www.nyc.gov/nypd

Welcome to the Official NYPD LinkedIn Page. For emergencies, dial 911. To submit crime tips & information, visit www.NYPDcrimestoppers.com or call 800-577-TIPS. The mission of the New York City Police Department is to enhance the quality of life in New York City by working in partnership with the community to enforce the law, preserve peace, protect the people, reduce fear, and maintain order. The New York City Police Department strives to foster a safe and fair City by incorporating Neighborhood Policing into all facets of Department operations, and solve the problems that create crime and disorder through an interdependent relationship between the people and its police, and by pioneering strategic innovation.

NAICS: 92212
NAICS Definition: Police Protection
Employees: 13,342
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dc-metropolitan-police-department.jpeg
DC Metropolitan Police Department
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-york-city-police-department.jpeg
New York City Police Department
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DC Metropolitan Police Department
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
New York City Police Department
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Average (This Year)

DC Metropolitan Police Department has 0.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for New York City Police Department in 2025.

Incident History — DC Metropolitan Police Department (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DC Metropolitan Police Department cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — New York City Police Department (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New York City Police Department cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dc-metropolitan-police-department.jpeg
DC Metropolitan Police Department
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Financial gain through resale of stolen devices
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2021
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 04/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-york-city-police-department.jpeg
New York City Police Department
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2019
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Infected NUC mini-PC plugged in by a contractor
Blog: Blog

FAQ

New York City Police Department company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DC Metropolitan Police Department company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

DC Metropolitan Police Department company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to New York City Police Department company.

In the current year, DC Metropolitan Police Department company has reported more cyber incidents than New York City Police Department company.

Both New York City Police Department company and DC Metropolitan Police Department company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.

DC Metropolitan Police Department company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other New York City Police Department company has not reported such incidents publicly.

DC Metropolitan Police Department company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while New York City Police Department company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither DC Metropolitan Police Department company nor New York City Police Department company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither DC Metropolitan Police Department nor New York City Police Department holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither DC Metropolitan Police Department company nor New York City Police Department company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

New York City Police Department company employs more people globally than DC Metropolitan Police Department company, reflecting its scale as a Law Enforcement.

Neither DC Metropolitan Police Department nor New York City Police Department holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DC Metropolitan Police Department nor New York City Police Department holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DC Metropolitan Police Department nor New York City Police Department holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DC Metropolitan Police Department nor New York City Police Department holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DC Metropolitan Police Department nor New York City Police Department holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DC Metropolitan Police Department nor New York City Police Department holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Marshmallow is a lightweight library for converting complex objects to and from simple Python datatypes. In versions from 3.0.0rc1 to before 3.26.2 and from 4.0.0 to before 4.1.2, Schema.load(data, many=True) is vulnerable to denial of service attacks. A moderately sized request can consume a disproportionate amount of CPU time. This issue has been patched in version 3.26.2 and 4.1.2.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

KEDA is a Kubernetes-based Event Driven Autoscaling component. Prior to versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3, an Arbitrary File Read vulnerability has been identified in KEDA, potentially affecting any KEDA resource that uses TriggerAuthentication to configure HashiCorp Vault authentication. The vulnerability stems from an incorrect or insufficient path validation when loading the Service Account Token specified in spec.hashiCorpVault.credential.serviceAccount. An attacker with permissions to create or modify a TriggerAuthentication resource can exfiltrate the content of any file from the node's filesystem (where the KEDA pod resides) by directing the file's content to a server under their control, as part of the Vault authentication request. The potential impact includes the exfiltration of sensitive system information, such as secrets, keys, or the content of files like /etc/passwd. This issue has been patched in versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Fedify is a TypeScript library for building federated server apps powered by ActivityPub. Prior to versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2, a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability exists in Fedify's document loader. The HTML parsing regex at packages/fedify/src/runtime/docloader.ts:259 contains nested quantifiers that cause catastrophic backtracking when processing maliciously crafted HTML responses. This issue has been patched in versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) in PluXml CMS 5.8.22 allows an attacker with administrator panel access to inject a malicious PHP webshell into a theme file (e.g., home.php).

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Xiongmai XM530 IP cameras on firmware V5.00.R02.000807D8.10010.346624.S.ONVIF 21.06. The GetStreamUri exposes RTSP URIs containing hardcoded credentials enabling direct unauthorized video stream access.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References