Comparison Overview

D.C. Bar

VS

Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team

D.C. Bar

901 4th St NW, Washington, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Since 1972 the District of Columbia Bar has been enhancing access to justice, improving the legal system, and empowering lawyers to achieve excellence. It is the fastest-growing unified bar in the United States, with more than 118,000 members in all 50 states and in 85 countries and territories around the world. To learn more about how the D.C. Bar serves its members and the larger legal community, visit www.dcbar.org.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 160
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team

undefined, Carlisle, undefined, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

As a team of highly experienced Costs Lawyers and Costs Draftsmen we are able to assist our Clients with all costs matters relating Private Client (Court of Protection, Probate & Family) work. Our aim is to build a long term business relationship with each and every client, and to offer a completely professional, yet personal approach to all your legal costing needs. This means tailoring our service to fit your needs. By instructing Paramount Legal Costs you will see an improvement not only in legal costs recovery but also in file turnaround and more importantly cash flow, safe in the knowledge that your files are in expert hands.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dc-bar.jpeg
D.C. Bar
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
D.C. Bar
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for D.C. Bar in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team in 2025.

Incident History — D.C. Bar (X = Date, Y = Severity)

D.C. Bar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dc-bar.jpeg
D.C. Bar
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/paramount-legal-costs-limited.jpeg
Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team
Incidents

FAQ

D.C. Bar company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to D.C. Bar company.

In the current year, Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team company and D.C. Bar company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team company nor D.C. Bar company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team company nor D.C. Bar company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team company nor D.C. Bar company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither D.C. Bar company nor Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither D.C. Bar nor Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither D.C. Bar company nor Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

D.C. Bar company employs more people globally than Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither D.C. Bar nor Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither D.C. Bar nor Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither D.C. Bar nor Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither D.C. Bar nor Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither D.C. Bar nor Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team holds HIPAA certification.

Neither D.C. Bar nor Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X