Comparison Overview

The Dayton Art Institute

VS

The Buffalo Zoo

The Dayton Art Institute

456 Belmonte Park North, Dayton, Ohio 45405, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Dayton Art Institute is committed to enriching the community by creating meaningful experiences with art that are available to all. Founded in 1919, The Dayton Art Institute is one of the region’s premier fine arts museums. In addition to exhibiting outstanding special exhibitions and impressive collections of art from throughout the world, the museum is renowned for education programming that includes an array of offerings for diverse audiences.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 73
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Buffalo Zoo

300 Parkside Ave, Buffalo, 14214, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1875, the Buffalo Zoo is the third oldest zoo in the United States. Each year, the Zoo welcomes approximately 400,000 visitors and is the second largest tourist attraction in Western New York, second only to Niagara Falls. Located on 23.5 acres of Buffalo’s beautiful Delaware Park, the Zoo exhibits a diverse collection of wild and exotic animals and more than 320 different species of plants. Open year-round, the Zoo is a constant source of conservation, education and recreation for Western New York. Indoor Attractions: EcoStation (sponsored by Tops Markets) Gorilla House (sponsored by Univera) Reptile House (sponsored by Goya Foods) The Living Tree House Giraffe House Outdoor Attractions: Sea Lion Cove (sponsored by NOCO Energy Corp.) – observe sea lions through underwater viewing or from our amphitheater Otter Creek (sponsored by Buffalo exterminating) – realistic, park-like exhibit, complete with stream & waterfall Vanishing Animals – learn more about threatened and endangered animals African Predator Habitat – view hyenas in a naturalistic African plains setting Bear Pits – exhibits polar bears, spectacled bears, grizzly and Kodiak bears Children’s Zoo – The Delta Sonic Heritage farm. interactive, educational and fun for kids! Habicat – houses African lions and Amur (Siberian) tigers Rhinoceros Exhibit – (sponsored by 2Find Your Home) Elephant Yard – (sponsored by Wegmans Markets) features our two female Asian elephants, Jothi and Surapa

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 123
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dayton-art-institute.jpeg
The Dayton Art Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-buffalo-zoo.jpeg
The Buffalo Zoo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Dayton Art Institute
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Buffalo Zoo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Dayton Art Institute in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Buffalo Zoo in 2026.

Incident History — The Dayton Art Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Dayton Art Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Buffalo Zoo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Buffalo Zoo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dayton-art-institute.jpeg
The Dayton Art Institute
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-buffalo-zoo.jpeg
The Buffalo Zoo
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both The Dayton Art Institute company and The Buffalo Zoo company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, The Buffalo Zoo company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Dayton Art Institute company.

In the current year, The Buffalo Zoo company and The Dayton Art Institute company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Buffalo Zoo company nor The Dayton Art Institute company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Buffalo Zoo company nor The Dayton Art Institute company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Buffalo Zoo company nor The Dayton Art Institute company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Dayton Art Institute company nor The Buffalo Zoo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Dayton Art Institute nor The Buffalo Zoo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Dayton Art Institute company nor The Buffalo Zoo company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Buffalo Zoo company employs more people globally than The Dayton Art Institute company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The Dayton Art Institute nor The Buffalo Zoo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Dayton Art Institute nor The Buffalo Zoo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Dayton Art Institute nor The Buffalo Zoo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Dayton Art Institute nor The Buffalo Zoo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Dayton Art Institute nor The Buffalo Zoo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Dayton Art Institute nor The Buffalo Zoo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H