Comparison Overview

DaySmart

VS

Zoho

DaySmart

3520 Green Court , Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, US
Last Update: 2026-02-25
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.daysmart.com

DaySmart is headquartered in Ann Arbor, MI. DaySmart has been providing business management solutions for over 20 years. Thousands of businesspeople let their day start with DaySmart. Our solutions are for businesses just getting started, or looking to jump start their growth. Our entire team strives to ensure that every customer has a great experience. Everyone on our team knows that without your business, we don’t have a business.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 222
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Zoho

Zoho Corporation Pvt. Ltd, Estancia IT Park, Plot No. 140 & 151,, Chennai, 603202, IN
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 800 and 849
https://www.zoho.com/

Zoho offers beautifully smart software to help you grow your business. With over 100 million users worldwide, Zoho's 55+ products aid your sales and marketing, support and collaboration, finance, and recruitment needs—letting you focus only on your business. Zoho respects user privacy and does not have an ad-revenue model in any part of its business, including its free products. Zoho Corporation is privately held and profitable, with its headquarters in Chennai, India, and offices across the globe.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 29,976
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/daysmart-software.jpeg
DaySmart
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zoho.jpeg
Zoho
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DaySmart
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Zoho
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DaySmart in 2026.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zoho in 2026.

Incident History — DaySmart (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DaySmart cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Zoho (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zoho cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/daysmart-software.jpeg
DaySmart
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zoho.jpeg
Zoho
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Authentication Bypass
Motivation: Account Takeover, Access Sensitive Data
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Zoho company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DaySmart company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Zoho company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas DaySmart company has not reported any.

In the current year, Zoho company and DaySmart company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Zoho company nor DaySmart company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Zoho company nor DaySmart company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Zoho company nor DaySmart company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Zoho company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while DaySmart company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither DaySmart nor Zoho holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Zoho company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to DaySmart company.

Zoho company employs more people globally than DaySmart company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither DaySmart nor Zoho holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DaySmart nor Zoho holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DaySmart nor Zoho holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DaySmart nor Zoho holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DaySmart nor Zoho holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DaySmart nor Zoho holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References