Comparison Overview

Daylight Books

VS

Information Age

Daylight Books

undefined, Bronx, NY, 10471, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Daylight is a non-profit organization dedicated to publishing art and photography books. By exploring the documentary mode along with the more conceptual concerns of fine-art, Daylight's uniquely collectible publications work to revitalize the relationship between art, photography, and the world-at-large.on Daylight also releases monthly multimedia podcasts and features a daily blog with exhibition and book reviews. Daylight has been featured by CNN, The New Yorker, The Los Angeles Times, The Associated Press, Utne Reader, American PHOTO, Source: The Photographic Review, Beautiful Decay, and PDN (Photo District News) and many more.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Information Age

29 Clerkenwell Road, London, EC1M 5LA, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Information Age was founded in 1995 as a print magazine. The brand launched a website in 2001 and evolved into a fully digital proposition in 2017. The Data Leadership Summit was launched in 2011, expanding into the awards event, together with the launch of the Tech Leaders Summit, the following year. The Tech Leaders Awards was launched in 2017. We support CTOs and technology leaders in managing the business critical issues that they are facing today, and in exploring and understanding the new technology innovations that will affect their businesses in the future.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/daylight-magazine.jpeg
Daylight Books
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/information-age.jpeg
Information Age
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Daylight Books
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Information Age
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Daylight Books in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Information Age in 2025.

Incident History — Daylight Books (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Daylight Books cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Information Age (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Information Age cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/daylight-magazine.jpeg
Daylight Books
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/information-age.jpeg
Information Age
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Daylight Books company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Information Age company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Information Age company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Daylight Books company.

In the current year, Information Age company and Daylight Books company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Information Age company nor Daylight Books company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Information Age company nor Daylight Books company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Information Age company nor Daylight Books company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Daylight Books company nor Information Age company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Daylight Books nor Information Age holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Daylight Books company nor Information Age company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Information Age company employs more people globally than Daylight Books company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Daylight Books nor Information Age holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Daylight Books nor Information Age holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Daylight Books nor Information Age holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Daylight Books nor Information Age holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Daylight Books nor Information Age holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Daylight Books nor Information Age holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.