Comparison Overview

Davis GCS

VS

Lane Communications

Davis GCS

101 East Robinson Avenue, Barberton, OH, 44203, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://DavisGCS.com

Commercial sheetfed printer offering complete Graphic Communication Solutions. 104 years of dedicated service and thoughtful performance in the Graphic Arts Industry. Specializing in printing on traditional and synthetic substrates, complete finishing and mailing services all performed in house. Also offering Advertising Specialties/Promotional Products at competative rates. Davis GCS is best know for their speed and ability to produce in the absolute tightest of deadlines.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Lane Communications

101 Mooringe Avenue, CAMDEN PARK, SA, 5038, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.laneprint.com.au

We are a responsible, accredited, forward thinking and innovative printer, focused on the needs of our customers. As a privately owned commercial printing and mailing company located in Adelaide, South Australia, Lane Print & Post has one of the largest ranges of offset colour printing, digital printing, mailing and binding equipment in South Australia, operating 24 hours a day, 6 days a week. Lane Print & Post is currently providing a complete security printing service, for federal, state and local government, financial institutions and utilities, which include activities, associated with forms design, software development, offset and variable digital printing, folding, binding, mailing, multi-channel distribution and secure storage as a total in-house service, throughout Australia and New Zealand. Our five operating divisions of Create, Print, Warehouse, Distribute and e-Commerce allow us to provide a turn-key solution, from analysing business needs right through to providing the infrastructure required to sustain an effective and reliable total in-house solution.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/davis-printing-company.jpeg
Davis GCS
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laneprint&post.jpeg
Lane Communications
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Davis GCS
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lane Communications
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Davis GCS in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lane Communications in 2025.

Incident History — Davis GCS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Davis GCS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lane Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lane Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/davis-printing-company.jpeg
Davis GCS
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laneprint&post.jpeg
Lane Communications
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Davis GCS company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lane Communications company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lane Communications company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Davis GCS company.

In the current year, Lane Communications company and Davis GCS company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lane Communications company nor Davis GCS company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lane Communications company nor Davis GCS company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lane Communications company nor Davis GCS company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Davis GCS company nor Lane Communications company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Davis GCS nor Lane Communications holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Davis GCS company nor Lane Communications company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lane Communications company employs more people globally than Davis GCS company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Davis GCS nor Lane Communications holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Davis GCS nor Lane Communications holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Davis GCS nor Lane Communications holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Davis GCS nor Lane Communications holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Davis GCS nor Lane Communications holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Davis GCS nor Lane Communications holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References