Comparison Overview

Davis Craig, PLLC

VS

Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law

Davis Craig, PLLC

13355 Noel Rd, Dallas, Texas, 75240, US
Last Update: 2025-11-30
Between 750 and 799

Davis Craig PLLC is a boutique law firm focused on telecommunications and technology transactions. The firm has represented hundreds of clients in telecommunications and technology transactions in forty-eight states and four countries. The firm’s attorneys have developed national reputations as industry leaders in telephone, video, Internet, rooftop antenna, and wireless services transactions. They have handled thousands of transactions on behalf of owners and managers of multifamily projects, mixed-use and master planned communities, and commercial properties, including many of the largest owners and managers in the country.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law

53rd Street, Marbella, Panama, Panama, undefined, PA
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

WILLIAMS & WILLIAMS is an innovative law firm created by a group of successful professionals that decided to join their strength and knowledge in order to provide a more comprehensive array of services by using their individual skills and experience, acquired after having important roles within the Government, Private Companies and Non for Profit Organizations. We believe that our clientele is the most valuable asset, therefore we are committed to offer real and timely solutions by applying the knowledge and efficacy of the firm, while offering a high quality personalized service to our clients. With an excellent network and reputation with government and private institutions, WILLIAMS & WILLIAMS is prepared to achieve the goals set by our domestic and international clientele, with dynamism and efficacy. WILLIAMS & WILLIAMS’ main office is located in Panama City, Panama’s social, cultural and economic heart and has correspondent offices in other territories of the region to satisfy the needs of the clients requesting the legal services of the firm.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/davis-craig-&-taylor-pllc.jpeg
Davis Craig, PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/williams-&-williams-attorneys-at-law.jpeg
Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Davis Craig, PLLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Davis Craig, PLLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law in 2025.

Incident History — Davis Craig, PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Davis Craig, PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/davis-craig-&-taylor-pllc.jpeg
Davis Craig, PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/williams-&-williams-attorneys-at-law.jpeg
Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Davis Craig, PLLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Davis Craig, PLLC company.

In the current year, Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law company and Davis Craig, PLLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law company nor Davis Craig, PLLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law company nor Davis Craig, PLLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law company nor Davis Craig, PLLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Davis Craig, PLLC company nor Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Davis Craig, PLLC nor Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Davis Craig, PLLC company nor Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Davis Craig, PLLC company employs more people globally than Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Davis Craig, PLLC nor Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Davis Craig, PLLC nor Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Davis Craig, PLLC nor Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Davis Craig, PLLC nor Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Davis Craig, PLLC nor Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Davis Craig, PLLC nor Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X