Comparison Overview

Davids & Cohen, P.C.

VS

wiggin(x)

Davids & Cohen, P.C.

40 Washington Street, Wellesley, MA, 02481, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Davids & Cohen is a professional corporation that has offices in Wellesley, Massachusetts; Hartford, Connecticut; and Providence, Rhode Island. The firm was founded in March of 1998. The firm's lawyers have spent their careers advising and representing clients in a wide variety of civil litigation, employment, property, business, tort and insurance matters. The firm's lawyers have over a hundred years of combined experience and have been recognized by Martindale-Hubbell with its highest AV rating. Each attorney strives to handle every matter as if it were the highest priority for that client and works hard to provide creative, straightforward and excellent results. The firm does not lose sight of the overriding objective in every matter our clients entrust to us, large or small; to bring about the best possible result in the most efficient manner achievable.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

wiggin(x)

265 Church Street, One Century Tower, New Haven, CT, US, 06510
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

wiggin(x), a division of Wiggin and Dana LLP, is designed to meet the needs of emerging and high growth companies, their investors and founders. Our lawyers work with clients, not as detached legal experts, but as trusted advisors and integrated team members who intimately understand our clients and their issues. We guide clients through formation, expansion, and ultimately, exit. In addition to providing sophisticated counsel on a wide range of funding transactions, wiggin(x) attorneys provide a full stack solution with areas of specialization that include M&A, structured finance, intellectual property, licensing and tech transfers, employment, immigration, tax, fund formation, international trade compliance, dispute resolution, commercial contracting, real estate and more.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/davids-&-cohen-p-c-.jpeg
Davids & Cohen, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wigginxlegal.jpeg
wiggin(x)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Davids & Cohen, P.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
wiggin(x)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Davids & Cohen, P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for wiggin(x) in 2025.

Incident History — Davids & Cohen, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Davids & Cohen, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — wiggin(x) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

wiggin(x) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/davids-&-cohen-p-c-.jpeg
Davids & Cohen, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wigginxlegal.jpeg
wiggin(x)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Davids & Cohen, P.C. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to wiggin(x) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, wiggin(x) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Davids & Cohen, P.C. company.

In the current year, wiggin(x) company and Davids & Cohen, P.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither wiggin(x) company nor Davids & Cohen, P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither wiggin(x) company nor Davids & Cohen, P.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither wiggin(x) company nor Davids & Cohen, P.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Davids & Cohen, P.C. company nor wiggin(x) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Davids & Cohen, P.C. nor wiggin(x) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Davids & Cohen, P.C. company nor wiggin(x) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Davids & Cohen, P.C. company employs more people globally than wiggin(x) company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Davids & Cohen, P.C. nor wiggin(x) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Davids & Cohen, P.C. nor wiggin(x) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Davids & Cohen, P.C. nor wiggin(x) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Davids & Cohen, P.C. nor wiggin(x) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Davids & Cohen, P.C. nor wiggin(x) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Davids & Cohen, P.C. nor wiggin(x) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X