Comparison Overview

Davids & Cohen, P.C.

VS

Government Legal Department

Davids & Cohen, P.C.

40 Washington Street, Wellesley, MA, 02481, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Davids & Cohen is a professional corporation that has offices in Wellesley, Massachusetts; Hartford, Connecticut; and Providence, Rhode Island. The firm was founded in March of 1998. The firm's lawyers have spent their careers advising and representing clients in a wide variety of civil litigation, employment, property, business, tort and insurance matters. The firm's lawyers have over a hundred years of combined experience and have been recognized by Martindale-Hubbell with its highest AV rating. Each attorney strives to handle every matter as if it were the highest priority for that client and works hard to provide creative, straightforward and excellent results. The firm does not lose sight of the overriding objective in every matter our clients entrust to us, large or small; to bring about the best possible result in the most efficient manner achievable.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Government Legal Department

102 Petty France, London, SW1H 9EA, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-29
Between 700 and 749

The Government Legal Department provides legal advice to government on the development, design and implementation of government policies and decisions, and represents the government in court. We have more than 1800 employees, around 1300 of whom are solicitors or barristers. GLD lawyers: • advise government whether a policy can be implemented under existing legislation • help prepare new bills and take them through Parliament • provide litigation services to the majority of government departments • advise and act for government on employment law, commercial law and European law • work closely with ministers, civil servants and Parliamentary counsel GLD’s Bona Vacantia Division administers the estates of people who die intestate (without a valid will and without known kin) and collects the assets of dissolved companies and other ownerless goods in England and Wales.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 2,551
Subsidiaries: 69
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
27
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/davids-&-cohen-p-c-.jpeg
Davids & Cohen, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Davids & Cohen, P.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Government Legal Department
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Davids & Cohen, P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Government Legal Department in 2025.

Incident History — Davids & Cohen, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Davids & Cohen, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Government Legal Department (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Government Legal Department cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/davids-&-cohen-p-c-.jpeg
Davids & Cohen, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/government-legal-department.jpeg
Government Legal Department
Incidents

FAQ

Davids & Cohen, P.C. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Government Legal Department company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Government Legal Department company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Davids & Cohen, P.C. company has not reported any.

In the current year, Government Legal Department company has reported more cyber incidents than Davids & Cohen, P.C. company.

Neither Government Legal Department company nor Davids & Cohen, P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Government Legal Department company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Davids & Cohen, P.C. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Government Legal Department company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Davids & Cohen, P.C. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Davids & Cohen, P.C. company nor Government Legal Department company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Davids & Cohen, P.C. nor Government Legal Department holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Government Legal Department company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Davids & Cohen, P.C. company.

Government Legal Department company employs more people globally than Davids & Cohen, P.C. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Davids & Cohen, P.C. nor Government Legal Department holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Davids & Cohen, P.C. nor Government Legal Department holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Davids & Cohen, P.C. nor Government Legal Department holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Davids & Cohen, P.C. nor Government Legal Department holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Davids & Cohen, P.C. nor Government Legal Department holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Davids & Cohen, P.C. nor Government Legal Department holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X