Comparison Overview

David L. Gates and Associates

VS

Pearson Clinical Assessments

David L. Gates and Associates

60048, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://davidlgates.com

We are a private practice of three full time and two part time therapists with two locations: Gurnee and Des Plaines, Illinois. We specialize in addictions, domestic violence, infidelity, Theraplay, and trauma work. Two of our staff are Hispanic and so provide therapy in Spanish that is culturally attuned.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Pearson Clinical Assessments

None, None, San Antonio, Texas, US, None
Last Update: 2026-01-16
Between 750 and 799
https://www.pearsonassessments.com?utm_medium=social&utm_source=linkedin&utm_campaign=Brand&utm_content=Homepage

Since our establishment in 1921, we have been committed to providing quality assessments, efficient testing procedures and valid and reliable information to help all individuals succeed. We develop and distribute tests and related products for professionals in psychology, health, business, general education, bilingual education, special education, and other areas serving people of all ages and cultures. We are committed to meeting the diverse needs of our customers through our people, service, innovation, and technology. We are dedicated to the pursuit of professional excellence, leadership, and growth through acquisition, development, publication, and the maintenance of quality assessment tools in order to anticipate and meet the needs of our customers.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 716
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
David L. Gates and Associates
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pearson-clinical-assessments.jpeg
Pearson Clinical Assessments
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
David L. Gates and Associates
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pearson Clinical Assessments
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for David L. Gates and Associates in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pearson Clinical Assessments in 2026.

Incident History — David L. Gates and Associates (X = Date, Y = Severity)

David L. Gates and Associates cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pearson Clinical Assessments (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pearson Clinical Assessments cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
David L. Gates and Associates
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pearson-clinical-assessments.jpeg
Pearson Clinical Assessments
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

David L. Gates and Associates company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pearson Clinical Assessments company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pearson Clinical Assessments company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to David L. Gates and Associates company.

In the current year, Pearson Clinical Assessments company and David L. Gates and Associates company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pearson Clinical Assessments company nor David L. Gates and Associates company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pearson Clinical Assessments company nor David L. Gates and Associates company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pearson Clinical Assessments company nor David L. Gates and Associates company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither David L. Gates and Associates company nor Pearson Clinical Assessments company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither David L. Gates and Associates nor Pearson Clinical Assessments holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither David L. Gates and Associates company nor Pearson Clinical Assessments company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pearson Clinical Assessments company employs more people globally than David L. Gates and Associates company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither David L. Gates and Associates nor Pearson Clinical Assessments holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither David L. Gates and Associates nor Pearson Clinical Assessments holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither David L. Gates and Associates nor Pearson Clinical Assessments holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither David L. Gates and Associates nor Pearson Clinical Assessments holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither David L. Gates and Associates nor Pearson Clinical Assessments holds HIPAA certification.

Neither David L. Gates and Associates nor Pearson Clinical Assessments holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References