Comparison Overview

Bridgman Gantt Law

VS

Spada Law Group, LLC

Bridgman Gantt Law

82 Church St, Asheville, North Carolina, 28801, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Asheville, North Carolina Disability & Injury Law Firm The legal staff at Bridgeman Gantt Law Offices focus their attention on helping people struggling with physical or mental ailments. They strive to provide effective and efficient legal services to lessen the financial burden on you and your family. Located all throughout North Carolina, our law firm is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services specializing in personal injury, disability, workers’ compensation, and social security cases. With a team of experienced attorneys, we have built a solid reputation for our commitment to helping individuals and families who have suffered injuries or faced difficulties in the workplace or through disability. It’s what we do and we believe that our personalized approach helps you, our client, succeed.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Spada Law Group, LLC

111 Everett Ave, Chelsea, 02150, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

When it comes to Personal Injury Law, we don’t have to guess what the other side is thinking; we already know and that helps you. If you have been injured and need an experienced injury attorney, Spada Law Group, LLC. is the team you need to WIN. Our team of lawyers and Case Managers is comprised of former insurance claims adjusters, insurance attorneys and seasoned trial lawyers. We started our careers working for the insurance industry so we know how they operate and how they settle injury claims. We were INSIDERS! We at Spada Law Group, LLC believe that our extensive experience on the “other side” gives our clients a true advantage in resolving their cases more quickly and for higher value. We don’t have to guess what the other side is thinking; we know and that helps you! We are conveniently located just minutes from Boston and East Boston. Spada Law Group services the Boston, Greater Boston and North Shore areas.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/david-gantt-law-office.jpeg
Bridgman Gantt Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spada-law-group.jpeg
Spada Law Group, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bridgman Gantt Law
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Spada Law Group, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bridgman Gantt Law in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Spada Law Group, LLC in 2025.

Incident History — Bridgman Gantt Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bridgman Gantt Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Spada Law Group, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Spada Law Group, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/david-gantt-law-office.jpeg
Bridgman Gantt Law
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spada-law-group.jpeg
Spada Law Group, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bridgman Gantt Law company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Spada Law Group, LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Spada Law Group, LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bridgman Gantt Law company.

In the current year, Spada Law Group, LLC company and Bridgman Gantt Law company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Spada Law Group, LLC company nor Bridgman Gantt Law company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Spada Law Group, LLC company nor Bridgman Gantt Law company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Spada Law Group, LLC company nor Bridgman Gantt Law company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bridgman Gantt Law company nor Spada Law Group, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bridgman Gantt Law nor Spada Law Group, LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bridgman Gantt Law company nor Spada Law Group, LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bridgman Gantt Law company employs more people globally than Spada Law Group, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Bridgman Gantt Law nor Spada Law Group, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bridgman Gantt Law nor Spada Law Group, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bridgman Gantt Law nor Spada Law Group, LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bridgman Gantt Law nor Spada Law Group, LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bridgman Gantt Law nor Spada Law Group, LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bridgman Gantt Law nor Spada Law Group, LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X