Comparison Overview

Dave Bland Engineering

VS

Mase Gulf

Dave Bland Engineering

Full Sutton Ind Est, York, Yorkshire YO41 1HS, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.davebland.co.uk

Dave Bland Engineering ltd, manufacturers of Recovery Vehicles and Equipment,is a long established company founded on the principles of quality engineering innovative design, and excellent customer service, Our busness is based upon quality and service. We aim to provide a range of products to meet our customers' demands and expectations within the industry (backed up by our excellent after sales service!). Our customers trust and rely upon quality advice and informed product knowledge, all from a single point of contact.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Mase Gulf

Olaya Road, Hind Bint Utbah Street, Talal Abu Ghazaleh Building, Fourth Floor, Riyadh, SA
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 800 and 849
http://www.masegulf.com

Mase Gulf was established in 2011, aiming to being reckoned as a leading supplier of Mechanical Equipment, and progressive innovator of Engineering Solutions. Thus, Mase Gulf has invested in creative professionals and innovative products, to ensure the highest quality of end product, delivered to a rapidly developing and demanding region.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dave-bland-engineering.jpeg
Dave Bland Engineering
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mase-gulf.jpeg
Mase Gulf
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dave Bland Engineering
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mase Gulf
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dave Bland Engineering in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mase Gulf in 2025.

Incident History — Dave Bland Engineering (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dave Bland Engineering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mase Gulf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mase Gulf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dave-bland-engineering.jpeg
Dave Bland Engineering
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mase-gulf.jpeg
Mase Gulf
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mase Gulf company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dave Bland Engineering company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mase Gulf company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dave Bland Engineering company.

In the current year, Mase Gulf company and Dave Bland Engineering company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mase Gulf company nor Dave Bland Engineering company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mase Gulf company nor Dave Bland Engineering company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mase Gulf company nor Dave Bland Engineering company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dave Bland Engineering company nor Mase Gulf company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dave Bland Engineering nor Mase Gulf holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dave Bland Engineering company nor Mase Gulf company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mase Gulf company employs more people globally than Dave Bland Engineering company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Dave Bland Engineering nor Mase Gulf holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dave Bland Engineering nor Mase Gulf holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dave Bland Engineering nor Mase Gulf holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dave Bland Engineering nor Mase Gulf holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dave Bland Engineering nor Mase Gulf holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dave Bland Engineering nor Mase Gulf holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References