Comparison Overview

Datum Developments

VS

PWI Engineering

Datum Developments

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Advanced Materials for Precision Engineering Datum Developments was formed in 2010 by a team of people with a lifetimes experience in the field of precision engineering technologies. We provide innovative products and processes that allow greater precision and operational capability to our customers products. We have developed an innovative polymer coatings for the electronics and precision engineering sectors. The product, called Polcoat, is a conformal coating that differs from anything else in the market because it is electro deposited and thus very cost effective when compared to CVD and more precise than spin coating.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PWI Engineering

10 Melrose Avenue, Cherry Hill, NJ, 08003, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

PWI Engineering was established in 1936 as Pennell & Wiltberger, Inc., and has evolved into a professional full-service facilities expert. We offer mechanical, electrical, plumbing, fire protection/fire alarm and energy engineering design and consulting services for various clients and projects. We also offer a myriad of value added services under one roof that allows us to provide an all-inclusive experience for our clients. Lean concepts are prevalent and integrated into our approach. We are able to have all of the disciplines, analysts, and managers at the table from the beginning to identify all components, tasks and challenges involved in each project. Our client retention over the past twenty years is approximately 90%. We believe that the key to our ability to build long-term professional relationships is our Passion to provide Expertise engineering and proven Results. Our headquarters is located in Jenkintown, Pennsylvania with are branches in New Jersey and New York. We are a hybrid company and offer a comprehensive benefits program to our team members. If you're looking for a new engineering opportunity, reach out to the contact on our website.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 61
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/datum-developments.jpeg
Datum Developments
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pwi-engineering.jpeg
PWI Engineering
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Datum Developments
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PWI Engineering
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Datum Developments in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PWI Engineering in 2025.

Incident History — Datum Developments (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Datum Developments cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PWI Engineering (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PWI Engineering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/datum-developments.jpeg
Datum Developments
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pwi-engineering.jpeg
PWI Engineering
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Datum Developments company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PWI Engineering company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PWI Engineering company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Datum Developments company.

In the current year, PWI Engineering company and Datum Developments company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PWI Engineering company nor Datum Developments company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PWI Engineering company nor Datum Developments company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PWI Engineering company nor Datum Developments company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Datum Developments company nor PWI Engineering company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Datum Developments nor PWI Engineering holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Datum Developments company nor PWI Engineering company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

PWI Engineering company employs more people globally than Datum Developments company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Datum Developments nor PWI Engineering holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Datum Developments nor PWI Engineering holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Datum Developments nor PWI Engineering holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Datum Developments nor PWI Engineering holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Datum Developments nor PWI Engineering holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Datum Developments nor PWI Engineering holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H