Comparison Overview

Datanumia, EDF Group

VS

Diebold Nixdorf

Datanumia, EDF Group

4, Place des Vosges, Courbevoie, 92052, FR
Last Update: 2026-04-03
Between 750 and 799

Datanumia, a subsidiary specialising in the optimisation and management of energy consumption, resulting from the merger between Netseenergy and EDEV Téléservices (Edelia). #Data #Digital #IA

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 196
Subsidiaries: 35
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Diebold Nixdorf

350 Orchard Ave NE, North Canton, 44720, US
Last Update: 2026-03-29
Between 650 and 699

Diebold Nixdorf automates, digitizes and transforms the way people bank and shop. Its integrated solutions connect digital and physical channels conveniently, securely and efficiently for millions of consumers every day. As an innovation partner for nearly all of the world's top 100 financial institutions and a majority of the top 25 global retailers, Diebold Nixdorf delivers unparalleled services and technology that power the daily operations and consumer experience of financial institutions and retailers around the world.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 20,251
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/datanumia.jpeg
Datanumia, EDF Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/diebold.jpeg
Diebold Nixdorf
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Datanumia, EDF Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Diebold Nixdorf
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Datanumia, EDF Group in 2026.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Diebold Nixdorf in 2026.

Incident History — Datanumia, EDF Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Datanumia, EDF Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Diebold Nixdorf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Diebold Nixdorf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/datanumia.jpeg
Datanumia, EDF Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/diebold.jpeg
Diebold Nixdorf
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Hard Drive Encryption Bypass
Motivation: Financial Data Breach, Unauthorized Cash Withdrawals
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 05/2020
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Datanumia, EDF Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Diebold Nixdorf company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Diebold Nixdorf company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Datanumia, EDF Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, Diebold Nixdorf company and Datanumia, EDF Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Diebold Nixdorf company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Datanumia, EDF Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Diebold Nixdorf company nor Datanumia, EDF Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Diebold Nixdorf company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Datanumia, EDF Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Diebold Nixdorf company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Datanumia, EDF Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Datanumia, EDF Group nor Diebold Nixdorf holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Datanumia, EDF Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Diebold Nixdorf company.

Diebold Nixdorf company employs more people globally than Datanumia, EDF Group company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Datanumia, EDF Group nor Diebold Nixdorf holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Datanumia, EDF Group nor Diebold Nixdorf holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Datanumia, EDF Group nor Diebold Nixdorf holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Datanumia, EDF Group nor Diebold Nixdorf holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Datanumia, EDF Group nor Diebold Nixdorf holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Datanumia, EDF Group nor Diebold Nixdorf holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H