Comparison Overview

Dataflexnet

VS

Moody's Corporation

Dataflexnet

Priestly Court, Stafford, undefined, ST18 0LQ, GB
Last Update: 2025-03-05 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900
http://www.dataflexnet.com

Strong

Dataflexnet is a commercial payments Fintech. Our clients, typically banks or schemes, see us as a centre of innovation, a technology provider, or financial processor, with the benefit they can focus on day to day business activities. Our clients are Mastercard, Diners Club International, Discover, along with an array of banks and card issuers across the world, and collaborate with the major travel management companies for corporate travel including Egencia (Expedia!) and Carson-Wagonlit.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Moody's Corporation

250 Greenwich Street, New York, New York, 10007, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900
http://www.moodys.com

In a world shaped by increasingly interconnected risks, Moody’s helps customers develop a holistic view of these risks to advance their business and act decisively. With a rich history of expertise in global markets and a diverse workforce in more than 40 countries, Moody’s unites the brightest minds to turn today’s risks into tomorrow’s opportunities.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 14,591
Subsidiaries: 14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dataflexnetltd.jpeg
Dataflexnet
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/moodys-corporation.jpeg
Moody's Corporation
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Dataflexnet
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Moody's Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dataflexnet in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Moody's Corporation in 2025.

Incident History — Dataflexnet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dataflexnet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Moody's Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Moody's Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dataflexnetltd.jpeg
Dataflexnet
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/moodys-corporation.jpeg
Moody's Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Dataflexnet company and Moody's Corporation company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Moody's Corporation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dataflexnet company.

In the current year, Moody's Corporation company and Dataflexnet company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Moody's Corporation company nor Dataflexnet company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Moody's Corporation company nor Dataflexnet company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Moody's Corporation company nor Dataflexnet company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dataflexnet company nor Moody's Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Moody's Corporation company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Dataflexnet company.

Moody's Corporation company employs more people globally than Dataflexnet company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

An issue was discovered in chinabugotech hutool before 5.8.4 allowing attackers to execute arbitrary expressions that lead to arbitrary method invocation and potentially remote code execution (RCE) via the QLExpressEngine class.

Published
Date
2025-09-25
Updated
Date
2025-09-25
References
Description

A weakness has been identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /sys/role/exportXls. This manipulation causes improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-09-25
Updated
Date
2025-09-25
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /sys/user/exportXls of the component Filter Handler. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-09-25
Updated
Date
2025-09-25
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /sys/tenant/deleteBatch. The manipulation of the argument ids leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-09-25
Updated
Date
2025-09-25
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was determined in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /api/getDepartUserList. Executing manipulation of the argument departId can lead to improper authorization. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-09-25
Updated
Date
2025-09-25
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References