Comparison Overview

DASKO LABEL

VS

Evan Evans

DASKO LABEL

PO Box 546, Seekonk, MA, 02771, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.daskolabel.com

DASKO LABEL, a Peak Technologies company, is committed to providing high quality identification warehouse labels, tags and signs - where you need them, when you need them! We believe in a “whatever it takes” service philosophy. From free samples for testing to material recommendations, label designs, barcode expertise, site visits, quick turn around on custom jobs… “whatever it takes” to make you successful with your label project. WE WANT TO BE YOUR LABEL PARTNER! DASKO is much more than just a product supplier. Our goal is to make your project a success and you to look good. We know what works...and what doesn't. Let us bring our experience, expertise and "whatever it takes" philosophy to your project so that you can do it once, and do it right. Contact us to discuss your label needs!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Evan Evans

4 Guilfoyle Av, Coburg North, Victoria, 3058, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.evanevans.com.au

Australia's leading digital printer of fabric display banners and flags, Evan Evan’s single-minded focus is to provide you with practical display solutions that make your message stand out. Service quality, innovation and solutions tailored to your needs is said by many and delivered by few. Evan Evans is one of the few. We don’t make statements we can’t back up. So call and us and put us to the test. Flags, banners and bunting – standard or hand-made, you decide the size Display images – from huge to small, on almost any material Display systems – one or many, portable or static Murals, window displays, light boxes, floor signage – total flexibility Display strategy, design, production, maintenance – your needs covered nationally Global experience, local knowledge – effective solutions Buy on-line or we’ll serve you – you choose Evan Evans provides some of the hardest-working and most cost-effective solutions to meet your display requirements. How? Apart from our team of experienced industry experts, we continually invest in equipment, processes, R&D and strategic partnerships globally to remain ahead of our competitors. And that means you benefit with cutting edge solutions. Creative Design: Working closely with you to get a strong understanding of your communication objectives, your target market, your budget and any environmental considerations, we’ll conceptualise display applications that ensure your brand or message stands out and gets noticed.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dasko-label.jpeg
DASKO LABEL
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/evan-evans.jpeg
Evan Evans
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DASKO LABEL
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Evan Evans
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DASKO LABEL in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Evan Evans in 2025.

Incident History — DASKO LABEL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DASKO LABEL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Evan Evans (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Evan Evans cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dasko-label.jpeg
DASKO LABEL
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/evan-evans.jpeg
Evan Evans
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

DASKO LABEL company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Evan Evans company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Evan Evans company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to DASKO LABEL company.

In the current year, Evan Evans company and DASKO LABEL company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Evan Evans company nor DASKO LABEL company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Evan Evans company nor DASKO LABEL company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Evan Evans company nor DASKO LABEL company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither DASKO LABEL company nor Evan Evans company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither DASKO LABEL nor Evan Evans holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither DASKO LABEL company nor Evan Evans company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Evan Evans company employs more people globally than DASKO LABEL company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither DASKO LABEL nor Evan Evans holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DASKO LABEL nor Evan Evans holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DASKO LABEL nor Evan Evans holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DASKO LABEL nor Evan Evans holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DASKO LABEL nor Evan Evans holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DASKO LABEL nor Evan Evans holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References