Comparison Overview

Dasa

VS

Advocate Aurora Health

Dasa

Av das Nações Unidas 7815, São Paulo, undefined, 05425-070, BR
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

A Dasa é a maior rede de saúde integrada do Brasil. Faz parte da vida de mais de 20 milhões de pessoas por ano, com alta tecnologia, experiência intuitiva e atitude à frente do tempo. Com mais de 50 mil colaboradores e 250 mil médicos parceiros, existe para ser a saúde que as pessoas desejam e que o mundo precisa, estando presente em cada etapa de cuidado. Acredita que para cuidar sempre é preciso cuidar por inteiro. Por isso, olha para a gestão da saúde de um jeito preventivo, preditivo e personalizado. Integra medicina diagnóstica, hospitais, genômica, oncologia, coordenação de cuidado, pronto atendimento, telemedicina, pesquisa clínica e ciência. Ao todo, conta com 15 hospitais referências (considerando rede própria, crescimentos inorgânicos e os deals que ainda estão sob aprovação dos órgãos reguladores), e mais de 59 marcas entre medicina diagnóstica e hospitais, distribuídas em mais de 900 unidades no Brasil. A Dasa garante uma navegação ágil, descomplicada e sem atritos na jornada da saúde, tanto para pacientes quanto para médicos, por meio da sua plataforma de gestão, o Nav. Além disso, oferece soluções integradas e inovadoras de saúde corporativa, por meio do Dasa Empresas. Somos Dasa e somos para toda a vida. Para mais informações, acesse: www.dasa.com.br

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 31,786
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Advocate Aurora Health

750 W Virginia St, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US, 53204
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Advocate Aurora Health and Atrium Health are now Advocate Health – the fifth-largest nonprofit integrated health system in the U.S. Advocate Health is the fifth-largest nonprofit integrated health system in the United States –created from the combination of Advocate Aurora Health and Atrium Health. Providing care under the names Advocate Health Care in Illinois, Atrium Health in the Carolinas, Georgia and Alabama, and Aurora Health Care in Wisconsin, Advocate Health is a national leader in clinical innovation, health outcomes, consumer experience and value-based care, with Wake Forest University School of Medicine serving as the academic core of the enterprise. Headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina, Advocate Health serves nearly 6 million patients and is engaged in hundreds of clinical trials and research studies. It is nationally recognized for its expertise in cardiology, neurosciences, oncology, pediatrics and rehabilitation, as well as organ transplants, burn treatments and specialized musculoskeletal programs. Advocate Health employs nearly 150,000 team members across 67 hospitals and over 1,000 care locations, and offers one of the nation’s largest graduate medical education programs with over 2,000 residents and fellows across more than 200 programs. Committed to equitable care for all, Advocate Health provides nearly $5 billion in annual community benefits. Learn more: advocatehealth.org Read our social media community engagement guidelines: aah.org/social

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 14,988
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dasa.jpeg
Dasa
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/advocate-aurora-health.jpeg
Advocate Aurora Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dasa
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Advocate Aurora Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dasa in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Advocate Aurora Health in 2025.

Incident History — Dasa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dasa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Advocate Aurora Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Advocate Aurora Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dasa.jpeg
Dasa
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/advocate-aurora-health.jpeg
Advocate Aurora Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Improper use of Meta Pixel
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Dasa company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Advocate Aurora Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Advocate Aurora Health company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Dasa company has not reported any.

In the current year, Advocate Aurora Health company and Dasa company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Advocate Aurora Health company nor Dasa company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Advocate Aurora Health company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Dasa company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Advocate Aurora Health company nor Dasa company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dasa company nor Advocate Aurora Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dasa nor Advocate Aurora Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dasa company nor Advocate Aurora Health company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Dasa company employs more people globally than Advocate Aurora Health company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Dasa nor Advocate Aurora Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dasa nor Advocate Aurora Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dasa nor Advocate Aurora Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dasa nor Advocate Aurora Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dasa nor Advocate Aurora Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dasa nor Advocate Aurora Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N