Comparison Overview

Dartronics, Inc.

VS

MS Elevators

Dartronics, Inc.

150 William Street, Perth Amboy, 08861, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Dartronics specializes in end-of-line automation systems for packaging, product marking, and industrial coding. We provide turnkey solutions that streamline production, improve traceability, and ensure packaging compliance — all from a single, trusted source. Whether you need individual machines or fully integrated systems, our team delivers customized solutions backed by expert engineering, responsive service, and deep industry experience. What We Offer: Packaging automation – case erectors, sealers, conveyors, stretch wrappers, palletizers Marking & coding – inkjet, thermal transfer, laser, labeling systems Inspection systems – barcode readers, vision inspection, verification solutions Automation integration – PLC programming, HMI design, control systems Service & support – installation, training, maintenance, spare parts Industries We Serve: Food & Beverage | Pharmaceuticals | Personal Care | Electronics | Industrial Products Headquartered in Perth Amboy, NJ — proudly serving the tri-state area and beyond.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

MS Elevators

13600, MY
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 800 and 849

MS Elevators is a JV elevator manufacturing company in Malaysia with Toshiba Elevator and Building Systems Corporation of Japan. It manufactures Toshiba brand of elevators since 1989 and now has designed its own brand of elevators. The manufacturing facility in Penang is complete with all mechanical and elevator system simulations, research and development (R&D) facilities including a 65m and 35m test towers

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 111
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dartronics-perth-amboy-nj.jpeg
Dartronics, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
MS Elevators
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dartronics, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MS Elevators
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dartronics, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MS Elevators in 2025.

Incident History — Dartronics, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dartronics, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MS Elevators (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MS Elevators cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dartronics-perth-amboy-nj.jpeg
Dartronics, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
MS Elevators
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

MS Elevators company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dartronics, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MS Elevators company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dartronics, Inc. company.

In the current year, MS Elevators company and Dartronics, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MS Elevators company nor Dartronics, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MS Elevators company nor Dartronics, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MS Elevators company nor Dartronics, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dartronics, Inc. company nor MS Elevators company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dartronics, Inc. nor MS Elevators holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dartronics, Inc. company nor MS Elevators company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

MS Elevators company employs more people globally than Dartronics, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Dartronics, Inc. nor MS Elevators holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dartronics, Inc. nor MS Elevators holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dartronics, Inc. nor MS Elevators holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dartronics, Inc. nor MS Elevators holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dartronics, Inc. nor MS Elevators holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dartronics, Inc. nor MS Elevators holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H