Comparison Overview

Dartmouth College

VS

Washington University in St. Louis

Dartmouth College

207 Parkhurst Hall, Hanover, NH, US, 03755-3529
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 0 and 549

Dartmouth educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 6,301
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Washington University in St. Louis

One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, mo, 63130-4899, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Washington University in St. Louis, a medium-sized, independent university, is dedicated to challenging its faculty and students alike to seek new knowledge and greater understanding of an ever-changing, multicultural world. The university has played an integral role in the history and continuing growth of St. Louis and benefits in turn from the wide array of social, cultural and recreational opportunities offered by the metropolitan area to its more than 2.8 million residents. The mission of Washington University in St. Louis is the promotion of learning — learning by students and by faculty. Teaching, the transmission of knowledge, is central to our mission, as is research, the creation of new knowledge.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 17,266
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dartmouth-college.jpeg
Dartmouth College
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/washington-university-in-st-louis.jpeg
Washington University in St. Louis
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dartmouth College
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Washington University in St. Louis
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

Dartmouth College has 471.43% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Washington University in St. Louis in 2025.

Incident History — Dartmouth College (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dartmouth College cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Washington University in St. Louis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Washington University in St. Louis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dartmouth-college.jpeg
Dartmouth College
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Oracle EBS Zero-Day Vulnerability (CVE-2025-61884) via remote access without authentication
Motivation: Financial Gain (Ransom Extortion), Data Theft for Dark Web Sales, Reputation Damage
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: software vulnerability (Oracle EBS), zero-day exploit
Motivation: Financial gain (data theft for extortion/leak)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/washington-university-in-st-louis.jpeg
Washington University in St. Louis
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Washington University in St. Louis company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dartmouth College company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Dartmouth College company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Washington University in St. Louis company has not reported any.

In the current year, Dartmouth College company has reported more cyber incidents than Washington University in St. Louis company.

Dartmouth College company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Washington University in St. Louis company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Dartmouth College company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Washington University in St. Louis company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Dartmouth College company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Washington University in St. Louis company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Dartmouth College company nor Washington University in St. Louis company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dartmouth College nor Washington University in St. Louis holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Washington University in St. Louis company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Dartmouth College company.

Washington University in St. Louis company employs more people globally than Dartmouth College company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither Dartmouth College nor Washington University in St. Louis holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dartmouth College nor Washington University in St. Louis holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dartmouth College nor Washington University in St. Louis holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dartmouth College nor Washington University in St. Louis holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dartmouth College nor Washington University in St. Louis holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dartmouth College nor Washington University in St. Louis holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X