Comparison Overview

Danville Museum of Fine Arts and History

VS

SFO Museum

Danville Museum of Fine Arts and History

975 Main St, Danville, Virginia, 24541, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03

The Danville Museum of Fine Arts and History is a non-profit organization whose mission is to inspire community cohesiveness and facilitate impactful education through the advancement of art and history in the Dan River Region. Located in Danville, Virginia, the museum offers art and history exhibits, programs, and events, and collaborates with local organizations and educational institutions throughout the year to provide art and culture for residents and visitors. The Danville Museum of Fine Arts and History’s board emphasizes diversity and inclusivity in its leadership and programming. The museum’s outreach extends to underserved communities, aiming to make its offerings accessible and relevant to all. Along with the new exhibits at the museum each year, the Danville Museum of Fine Arts and History currently has four permanent exhibits ⎼ the Camilla Williams Exhibit; Movement, the Danville Civil Rights exhibit; the Behind the Lines, Danville's Civil War exhibit; and the Danville Hall of Fame. The museum has an extensive collection of antiques, historic documents, and art by 19th, 20th, and 21st-century artists, including the Camilla Williams Collection, the Kennedy-Revell Collection, and the Stratford College Collection. The museum is housed in the Sutherlin Mansion, an Italian Villa-style house built in 1859 for the Sutherlin family. Designed by Richmond architect Frank B. Clopton, the house is recognized as one of the finest examples of Italianate architecture in the State of Virginia and is designated as a Virginia Historic Landmark and listed on the National Register of Historic Places.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SFO Museum

San Francisco International Airport, None, San Francisco, California, US, 94128
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Created in 1980, SFO Museum was the first cultural institution of its kind located in an international airport. An ever-changing schedule of exhibitions on a diverse range of subjects provides an educational and cultural experience for all visitors to the Airport. SFO Museum's mission is to delight, engage, and inspire a global audience with a broad range of programming; to collect, preserve, interpret, and share the history of commercial aviation; and to enrich the public experience at San Francisco International Airport.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/danville-museum-of-fine-arts-and-history.jpeg
Danville Museum of Fine Arts and History
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sfo-museum.jpeg
SFO Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Danville Museum of Fine Arts and History
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SFO Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Danville Museum of Fine Arts and History in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SFO Museum in 2025.

Incident History — Danville Museum of Fine Arts and History (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Danville Museum of Fine Arts and History cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SFO Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SFO Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/danville-museum-of-fine-arts-and-history.jpeg
Danville Museum of Fine Arts and History
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sfo-museum.jpeg
SFO Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SFO Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Danville Museum of Fine Arts and History company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SFO Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Danville Museum of Fine Arts and History company.

In the current year, SFO Museum company and Danville Museum of Fine Arts and History company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SFO Museum company nor Danville Museum of Fine Arts and History company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SFO Museum company nor Danville Museum of Fine Arts and History company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SFO Museum company nor Danville Museum of Fine Arts and History company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Danville Museum of Fine Arts and History company nor SFO Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Danville Museum of Fine Arts and History nor SFO Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Danville Museum of Fine Arts and History company nor SFO Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SFO Museum company employs more people globally than Danville Museum of Fine Arts and History company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Danville Museum of Fine Arts and History nor SFO Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Danville Museum of Fine Arts and History nor SFO Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Danville Museum of Fine Arts and History nor SFO Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Danville Museum of Fine Arts and History nor SFO Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Danville Museum of Fine Arts and History nor SFO Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Danville Museum of Fine Arts and History nor SFO Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X