Comparison Overview

Danske Bank

VS

Global Payments Inc.

Danske Bank

Bernstorffsgade 40, Copenhagen, Capital Region of Denmark, 1577, DK
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 800 and 849

Danske Bank – A driver of growth and development For more than a 150 years, Danske Bank has strived to be a driver of growth and development in society. We have developed in tandem with the societies we are part of, and our advisory services, expertise and financial solutions have helped individuals, families, businesses and organisations to realise their ambitions and potential. With long-term sustainable development as our ambition, we will continue to work every day to be the best possible bank, for the benefit of our customers, employees, shareholders and the societies we are part of. Follow us for relevant content and insights You will receive the latest news, insights and information that can inspire and help you with your everyday financial needs. On our company page, you can also read more about life as an employee at Danske Bank and be sure to check our current job openings if you are interested in joining our international community of 22,000 people and help us build an even more innovative, agile and truly customer-centric culture.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 19,223
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Global Payments Inc.

None, None, Atlanta, Georgia, US, None
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Global Payments (NYSE : GPN) helps businesses around the world enable commerce and provide exceptional experiences to their customers. Our payment technology and software solutions enable merchants and developers to deliver seamless customer experiences, run smarter operations and adapt quickly to change. Because if it has anything to do with commerce, we are already on it. With 27,000 team members across 38 countries, we have the scale and expertise to help businesses grow with confidence. Headquartered in Georgia, Global Payments is a Fortune 500® company and a member of the S&P 500. Learn more at company.globalpayments.com and follow us on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram and X.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 24,185
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/danskebank.jpeg
Danske Bank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/global-payments.jpeg
Global Payments Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Danske Bank
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Global Payments Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Danske Bank in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Global Payments Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Danske Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Danske Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Global Payments Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Global Payments Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/danskebank.jpeg
Danske Bank
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/global-payments.jpeg
Global Payments Inc.
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2012
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2012
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Danske Bank company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Global Payments Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Global Payments Inc. company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Danske Bank company has not reported any.

In the current year, Global Payments Inc. company and Danske Bank company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Global Payments Inc. company nor Danske Bank company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Global Payments Inc. company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Danske Bank company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Global Payments Inc. company nor Danske Bank company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Danske Bank company nor Global Payments Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Danske Bank nor Global Payments Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Danske Bank company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Global Payments Inc. company.

Global Payments Inc. company employs more people globally than Danske Bank company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Danske Bank nor Global Payments Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Danske Bank nor Global Payments Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Danske Bank nor Global Payments Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Danske Bank nor Global Payments Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Danske Bank nor Global Payments Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Danske Bank nor Global Payments Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H