Comparison Overview

Daniel Lenghea Law

VS

Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity

Daniel Lenghea Law

13899 Biscayne Blvd Suite 415, North Miami Beach, FL, 33181, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Represent clients on issues of: BUSINESS LAW: start-ups, buy/sale of business, incorporations, registered agent, off-shore incorporations, business compliance, contracts, shareholder agreements, derivative actions, licensing, local government, debtor creditor law; CRIMINAL LAW STATE AND FEDERAL: white collar crimes, money laundering, wire fraud, banking fraud, passport fraud, internet fraud, electronic device, conspiracy, drug trafficking, drug distribution, drug importation, possession of restricted substance, importation of aliens, visa fraud, forged passports, immigration fraud, assault and battery, rape, robbery, theft, DUI, DWI; IMMIGRATION LAW, business visa, investor visa, E2, EB5, family green card, adjustment of status, marriage green card, fiancee visa, consular processing, reentry permit, processing for immigrants with criminal records, employment authorizations, extraordinary ability aliens, performer visa, interviews before USCIS, immigration proceedings, removal/deportation, hearings.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity

Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, 4222, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity strives to advance personal freedom and human dignity through fearless and novel scholarship. The Journal is committed to big picture analysis, transformative approaches to law, and giving voice to those who have been silenced, disenfranchised, or marginalised. The Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity is published twice a year. The submission dates are 31 January (Issue 1) and 31 July (Issue 2).

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/daniel-lenghea-p-a-.jpeg
Daniel Lenghea Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/griffith-journal-of-law-&-human-dignity.jpeg
Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Daniel Lenghea Law
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Daniel Lenghea Law in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity in 2025.

Incident History — Daniel Lenghea Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Daniel Lenghea Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/daniel-lenghea-p-a-.jpeg
Daniel Lenghea Law
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/griffith-journal-of-law-&-human-dignity.jpeg
Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Daniel Lenghea Law company and Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Daniel Lenghea Law company.

In the current year, Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity company and Daniel Lenghea Law company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity company nor Daniel Lenghea Law company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity company nor Daniel Lenghea Law company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity company nor Daniel Lenghea Law company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Daniel Lenghea Law company nor Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Daniel Lenghea Law nor Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Daniel Lenghea Law company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity company.

Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity company employs more people globally than Daniel Lenghea Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Daniel Lenghea Law nor Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Daniel Lenghea Law nor Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Daniel Lenghea Law nor Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Daniel Lenghea Law nor Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Daniel Lenghea Law nor Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Daniel Lenghea Law nor Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X