Comparison Overview

Dancer Profile

VS

Big Apple Circus

Dancer Profile

undefined, Birmingham, England, B28 9HH, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Online business to assist dancers in promoting their own dancer profiles as a way to seek employment within the dancing industry. The site will allow dancers who are nearing the end of their training plus those who have completed their training to upload full training and work experience history details as part of their profile.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Big Apple Circus

235 Park Avenue, New York, 10003, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

On July 18, 1977, Paul Binder and Michael Christensen founded the Big Apple Circus with its first performance in Battery Park City. They had recently returned from a street performing tour of Europe where they had been invited to participate in Annie Fratellini’s first production of her Nouveau Cirque in Dijon in the summer of 1975. German-based Circus-Theater Roncalli was founded in 1976 by Bernhard Paul and Andre Heller and comes from the same one-ring, traditional Nouveau Cirque style. Since 1981, Lincoln Center has been home to the Big Apple Circus. Here, in 1988, the Big Apple Circus first introduced New Yorkers to China’s modern circus tradition with The Big Apple Circus Meets the Monkey King, and, in 1994, welcomed the famous Swiss mime group in Grandma Meets Mummenschanz. This year, we welcome Circus-Theater Roncalli for its U.S. premier and a collaboration on an all new show, Journey to the Rainbow. Join us under the Big Top through January 15th, 2024!

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 154
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dancer-profile.jpeg
Dancer Profile
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/big-apple-circus.jpeg
Big Apple Circus
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dancer Profile
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Big Apple Circus
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dancer Profile in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Big Apple Circus in 2025.

Incident History — Dancer Profile (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dancer Profile cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Big Apple Circus (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Big Apple Circus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dancer-profile.jpeg
Dancer Profile
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/big-apple-circus.jpeg
Big Apple Circus
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Dancer Profile company and Big Apple Circus company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Big Apple Circus company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dancer Profile company.

In the current year, Big Apple Circus company and Dancer Profile company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Big Apple Circus company nor Dancer Profile company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Big Apple Circus company nor Dancer Profile company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Big Apple Circus company nor Dancer Profile company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dancer Profile company nor Big Apple Circus company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dancer Profile nor Big Apple Circus holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dancer Profile company nor Big Apple Circus company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Big Apple Circus company employs more people globally than Dancer Profile company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Dancer Profile nor Big Apple Circus holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dancer Profile nor Big Apple Circus holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dancer Profile nor Big Apple Circus holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dancer Profile nor Big Apple Circus holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dancer Profile nor Big Apple Circus holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dancer Profile nor Big Apple Circus holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N