Comparison Overview

Dancebox Studio

VS

Stages

Dancebox Studio

2711 S MacDill Ave, Tampa, Florida, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

We are a studio committed to providing superior dance and performing arts education, with an emphasis on technique and artistry. Together, with our students and dance families, we are fostering a community of young dance artists that embrace and value individuality, creativity and discipline. We strive to cultivate young dancers, from their first step in a dance studio through their pre-professional training. Our students discover their unique artistic voices in a creative and inclusive environment under the guidance of our esteemed faculty, comprised of caring and experienced dance educators. At Dancebox, we give each and every dancer the personal attention required to help our students excel as dancers, grow as individuals, and enrich their passion for the art form.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Stages

800 Rosine St, Houston, Texas, 77019, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Founded in 1978, Stages makes plays and tells stories that invite everyone to live more deeply and love more boldly. The common link throughout our work is a focus on sharing compelling human stories in intimate performance spaces that allow audiences to connect with both the art on stage and the people who help create it. Stages has grown to become Houston’s sixth-largest nonprofit performing arts producer overall, and the largest outside of Houston’s downtown theater district. Stages is one of the region’s leading artistic employers, producing an average of 12 productions per year totaling more than 430 performances and welcoming 65,000+ visitors each season. In January 2020, Stages opened The Gordy, a new $35.4 million three-theater venue that will transform how Houston artists and audiences experience theater.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 75
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dancebox-studio.jpeg
Dancebox Studio
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stageshouston.jpeg
Stages
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dancebox Studio
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stages
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dancebox Studio in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stages in 2025.

Incident History — Dancebox Studio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dancebox Studio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stages (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stages cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dancebox-studio.jpeg
Dancebox Studio
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stageshouston.jpeg
Stages
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Dancebox Studio company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Stages company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Stages company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dancebox Studio company.

In the current year, Stages company and Dancebox Studio company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Stages company nor Dancebox Studio company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Stages company nor Dancebox Studio company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Stages company nor Dancebox Studio company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dancebox Studio company nor Stages company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dancebox Studio nor Stages holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dancebox Studio company nor Stages company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Stages company employs more people globally than Dancebox Studio company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Dancebox Studio nor Stages holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dancebox Studio nor Stages holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dancebox Studio nor Stages holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dancebox Studio nor Stages holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dancebox Studio nor Stages holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dancebox Studio nor Stages holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N