Comparison Overview

Dance in the Parks

VS

The Lark Theatre

Dance in the Parks

1647 W Farwell Ave 1D Chicago, Illinois 60626, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.danceintheparks.org

Dance in the Parks’ mission is to bring free, professional dance performances to new audiences in the most accessible venues in Chicago—neighborhood parks. We hope to expose audiences unfamiliar with dance to the art form as well as to local performers and choreographers in a relaxed, casual atmosphere in order to build future relationships with the greater Chicago dance community.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The Lark Theatre

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799
http://www.larktheatre.org

The Lark is an international theater laboratory, based in New York City, dedicated to empowering playwrights by providing transformative support within a global community. We provide writers with money, space, collaborators, audiences, professional connections and the freedom to design their own processes of exploration. We believe that playwrights are society’s mythmakers and their work strengthens our collective capacity to understand our world and imagine its future.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dance-in-the-parks.jpeg
Dance in the Parks
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lark-play-development-center.jpeg
The Lark Theatre
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dance in the Parks
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Lark Theatre
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dance in the Parks in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Lark Theatre in 2025.

Incident History — Dance in the Parks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dance in the Parks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Lark Theatre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Lark Theatre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dance-in-the-parks.jpeg
Dance in the Parks
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lark-play-development-center.jpeg
The Lark Theatre
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Dance in the Parks company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Lark Theatre company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Lark Theatre company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dance in the Parks company.

In the current year, The Lark Theatre company and Dance in the Parks company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Lark Theatre company nor Dance in the Parks company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Lark Theatre company nor Dance in the Parks company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Lark Theatre company nor Dance in the Parks company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dance in the Parks company nor The Lark Theatre company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dance in the Parks nor The Lark Theatre holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dance in the Parks company nor The Lark Theatre company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Lark Theatre company employs more people globally than Dance in the Parks company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Dance in the Parks nor The Lark Theatre holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dance in the Parks nor The Lark Theatre holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dance in the Parks nor The Lark Theatre holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dance in the Parks nor The Lark Theatre holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dance in the Parks nor The Lark Theatre holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dance in the Parks nor The Lark Theatre holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References