Comparison Overview

Q: Between Dana Incorporated company and Magna International company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?

Magna International company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dana Incorporated company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Q: Between Dana Incorporated company and Magna International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?

Historically, Magna International company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dana Incorporated company.

Q: Between Dana Incorporated company and Magna International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?

In the current year, Magna International company and Dana Incorporated company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Q: Between Dana Incorporated company and Magna International company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?

Neither Magna International company nor Dana Incorporated company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Q: Between Dana Incorporated company and Magna International company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?

Neither Magna International company nor Dana Incorporated company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Q: Between Dana Incorporated company and Magna International company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?

Neither Magna International company nor Dana Incorporated company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Q: Between Dana Incorporated company and Magna International company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?

Neither Dana Incorporated company nor Magna International company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Q: Between Dana Incorporated company and Magna International company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?

Neither Dana Incorporated nor Magna International holds any compliance certifications.

Q: Between Dana Incorporated company and Magna International company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?

Dana Incorporated company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Magna International company.

Dana Incorporated

3939 Technology Drive, Maumee, 43537, US

Last Update: 2026-01-21

View Profile

Between 750 and 799

https://www.dana.com

In a world of constant motion, life is about balance. At Dana, our balanced approach considers the people, products, and planet that sustain us all. For 120 years, we've been powering innovation to move our world. Today, over 25,000 Dana people, in more than 20 countries, advance drive and motion systems, thermal and sealing technologies, and power management innovations. Supporting traditional, hybrid, and EV manufacturers, wherever the road takes us. We're not just adapting to the future of mobility. We're shaping it. Headquartered in Maumee, Ohio, United States — Dana reported sales of $7.7 billion in 2024. We were named among the "World's Most Ethical Companies 2025” by Ethisphere and as one of "America's Most Responsible Companies 2023" by Newsweek. We’re always looking for talented people to join the Dana team. For more, please visit https://jobs.dana.com.

NAICS: 3361

NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing

Employees: 16,577

Subsidiaries: 6

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

View Profile

Magna International

377 Magna Drive, Aurora, Ontario, L4G 7K1, CA

Last Update: 2026-01-20

Between 750 and 799

http://www.magna.com

We see a future where everyone can live and move without limitations. That’s why we are developing technologies, systems and concepts that make vehicles safer and cleaner, while serving our communities, the planet and, above all, people. Forward. For all. Our common shares trade on the Toronto Stock Exchange (MG) and the New York Stock Exchange (MGA). For further information about Magna, visit www.magna.com.

NAICS: 3361

NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing

Employees: 40,085

Subsidiaries: 0

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Dana Incorporated

—

ISO 27001

Not verified

—

SOC2 Type 1

Not verified

—

SOC2 Type 2

Not verified

—

GDPR

Not verified

—

PCI DSS

Not verified

—

HIPAA

Not verified

Magna International

—

ISO 27001

Not verified

—

SOC2 Type 1

Not verified

—

SOC2 Type 2

Not verified

—

GDPR

Not verified

—

PCI DSS

Not verified

—

HIPAA

Not verified

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dana Incorporated in 2026.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Magna International in 2026.

Incident History — Dana Incorporated (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dana Incorporated cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Magna International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Magna International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Dana Incorporated

Incidents

No Incident

Magna International

Incidents

No Incident

Magna International company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dana Incorporated company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Magna International company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dana Incorporated company.

In the current year, Magna International company and Dana Incorporated company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Magna International company nor Dana Incorporated company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Magna International company nor Dana Incorporated company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Magna International company nor Dana Incorporated company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dana Incorporated company nor Magna International company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dana Incorporated nor Magna International holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Dana Incorporated company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Magna International company.

Magna International company employs more people globally than Dana Incorporated company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Dana Incorporated nor Magna International holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dana Incorporated nor Magna International holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dana Incorporated nor Magna International holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dana Incorporated nor Magna International holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dana Incorporated nor Magna International holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dana Incorporated nor Magna International holds GDPR certification.

Description

SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g., execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.

Published

Date

2026-01-20

Updated

Date

2026-01-20

Risk Information

cvss4

Base: 7.7

Severity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

References

https://github.com/cloudflare/workers-sdk

Description

Published

Date

2026-01-20

Updated

Date

2026-01-20

Risk Information

cvss3

Base: 8.2

Severity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

References

https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2026.html

Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).

Published

Date

2026-01-20

Updated

Date

2026-01-20

Risk Information

cvss3

Base: 8.1

Severity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L

References

https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2026.html

Description

Published

Date

2026-01-20

Updated

Date

2026-01-20

Risk Information

cvss3

Base: 8.2

Severity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

References

https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2026.html

Description

Published

Date

2026-01-20

Updated

Date

2026-01-20

Risk Information

cvss3

Base: 8.2

Severity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

References

https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2026.html

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Comparison Overview

Dana Incorporated

VS

Magna International

Dana Incorporated

Magna International

Compliance Badges Comparison

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Incident History — Dana Incorporated (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Incident History — Magna International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Notable Incidents

No Incident

No Incident

FAQ

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-0933

Risk Information

CVE-2026-21990

Risk Information

CVE-2026-21989

Risk Information

CVE-2026-21988

Risk Information

CVE-2026-21987

Risk Information

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Comparison Overview

Dana Incorporated

VS

Magna International

Dana Incorporated

Magna International

Compliance Badges Comparison

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Incident History — Dana Incorporated (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Incident History — Magna International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Notable Incidents

No Incident

No Incident

FAQ

Between Dana Incorporated company and Magna International company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?

Between Dana Incorporated company and Magna International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?

Between Dana Incorporated company and Magna International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?

Between Dana Incorporated company and Magna International company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?

Between Dana Incorporated company and Magna International company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?

Between Dana Incorporated company and Magna International company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?

Between Dana Incorporated company and Magna International company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?

Between Dana Incorporated company and Magna International company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?

Between Dana Incorporated company and Magna International company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?

Between Dana Incorporated company and Magna International company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?

Between Dana Incorporated company and Magna International company, which one has the largest number of employees ?

Between Dana Incorporated and Magna International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?

Between Dana Incorporated and Magna International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?

Which company is ISO 27001 certified — Dana Incorporated or Magna International ?

Which company is PCI DSS compliant — Dana Incorporated or Magna International ?

Between Dana Incorporated and Magna International, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?

Between Dana Incorporated and Magna International, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-0933

Risk Information

CVE-2026-21990

Risk Information

CVE-2026-21989

Risk Information

CVE-2026-21988

Risk Information

CVE-2026-21987

Risk Information