Comparison Overview

Center for Emotional Health

VS

CoupleStrong

Center for Emotional Health

280 Executive Park Drive, Concord, NC, 28205, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://cehcharlotte.com

At Center for Emotional Health, is a mental health organization offering numerous mental health services in North Carolina, such as outpatient therapy, medication management, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), and counseling services for individuals, couples and groups. Virtual appointments + phone consultations are also available! With 27 locations across NC, Center for Emotional Health offers the convenience and flexibility our clients need in order to properly address their mental health requirements.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 247
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

CoupleStrong

18821 Wimbledon Cir, None, Lutz, FL, US, 33558
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799
https://couplestrong.com

🌟 Welcome to Couplestrong! 🌟 🔥 Enhancing Relationships with Science-backed Skills! 🔥 📞 Ready to take your relationship to new heights? 🚀 Learn about our therapist All-Access Subscriptions to assist you with couples therapy. "Couplestrong" is a term used to describe a couple who share a strong and supportive bond with each other. They face challenges and obstacles together and are able to overcome them as a team. They communicate openly and honestly, and are committed to each other's growth and well-being. They have a deep understanding and respect for each other's individuality, while also cherishing their shared experiences and building a life together. A couple who is "couplestrong" is able to weather the ups and downs of life with grace and resilience, and their love and connection only grows stronger with time.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dame-malone-coaching.jpeg
Center for Emotional Health
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/couplestrong.jpeg
CoupleStrong
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Center for Emotional Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CoupleStrong
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Emotional Health in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CoupleStrong in 2026.

Incident History — Center for Emotional Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Emotional Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CoupleStrong (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CoupleStrong cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dame-malone-coaching.jpeg
Center for Emotional Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/couplestrong.jpeg
CoupleStrong
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Center for Emotional Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CoupleStrong company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CoupleStrong company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Center for Emotional Health company.

In the current year, CoupleStrong company and Center for Emotional Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CoupleStrong company nor Center for Emotional Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CoupleStrong company nor Center for Emotional Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CoupleStrong company nor Center for Emotional Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Center for Emotional Health company nor CoupleStrong company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Center for Emotional Health nor CoupleStrong holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Center for Emotional Health company nor CoupleStrong company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Center for Emotional Health company employs more people globally than CoupleStrong company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Center for Emotional Health nor CoupleStrong holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Center for Emotional Health nor CoupleStrong holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Center for Emotional Health nor CoupleStrong holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Center for Emotional Health nor CoupleStrong holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Center for Emotional Health nor CoupleStrong holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Center for Emotional Health nor CoupleStrong holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References