Comparison Overview

Dallas Jewish Historical Society

VS

The British Museum

Dallas Jewish Historical Society

7900 Northaven Road, Dallas, TX, 75230, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

It is the mission of the Dallas Jewish Historical Society to preserve and protect collections of written, visual and audible materials that document the history of the Dallas Jewish community, and to make these materials available to the public and researchers, and to keep the past as a living legacy for our community.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The British Museum

Great Russell Street, London, London, GB, WC1B 3DG
Last Update: 2026-01-23

With cultures from the dawn of human history to the present day, the British Museum is a museum of the world, for the world. Founded in 1753, the Museum holds, conserves, researches, exhibits and shares the collection in its care, making it available to the widest possible audience. It is the foremost museum of the history of humanity, where visitors can engage with two million years of cultural achievement. Visitors can enjoy a unique comparison of world cultures in a collection that brings together objects from around the globe, spanning continents and oceans. No other museum is responsible for a collection of the same depth, breadth, beauty and significance. World-famous objects including the Rosetta Stone, Parthenon sculptures, and Egyptian mummies are visited by 6 million visitors per year. In addition to the vast permanent collection, the Museum’s special exhibitions, displays and events are all designed to advance understanding of the collection and cultures they represent. Drawing on the richness of its collection of 8 million objects and the unparalleled expertise of its staff, the Museum has cemented its position as a world forum and a natural place for debate on issues facing today’s globalised society. Find out more about all exhibitions and book tickets: http://www.britishmuseum.org/whats_on/special_exhibitions.aspx For current job opportunities please visit http://www.britishmuseum.org/the_museum/jobs.aspx

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 1,278
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dallas-jewish-historical-society.jpeg
Dallas Jewish Historical Society
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-british-museum.jpeg
The British Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dallas Jewish Historical Society
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The British Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dallas Jewish Historical Society in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The British Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Dallas Jewish Historical Society (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dallas Jewish Historical Society cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The British Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The British Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dallas-jewish-historical-society.jpeg
Dallas Jewish Historical Society
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-british-museum.jpeg
The British Museum
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Dallas Jewish Historical Society company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The British Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

The British Museum company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Dallas Jewish Historical Society company has not reported any.

In the current year, The British Museum company and Dallas Jewish Historical Society company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The British Museum company nor Dallas Jewish Historical Society company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The British Museum company nor Dallas Jewish Historical Society company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

The British Museum company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Dallas Jewish Historical Society company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Dallas Jewish Historical Society company nor The British Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dallas Jewish Historical Society nor The British Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dallas Jewish Historical Society company nor The British Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The British Museum company employs more people globally than Dallas Jewish Historical Society company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Dallas Jewish Historical Society nor The British Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dallas Jewish Historical Society nor The British Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dallas Jewish Historical Society nor The British Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dallas Jewish Historical Society nor The British Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dallas Jewish Historical Society nor The British Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dallas Jewish Historical Society nor The British Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H