Comparison Overview

Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch

VS

Denver Springs

Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch

6301 19th Ave. NW , Minot, 58702, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dakotaranch.org

Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch is a Christ-centered residential treatment and educational center for children and their families. We help the most troubled, complicated and amazing kids by providing best-in-class psychiatric therapy and trauma-informed care, where we look kids in the eye, walk with them, and help them become their best selves. In addition to Residential Treatment Facilities in Fargo, Bismarck, and Minot, the Ranch provides Outpatient Psychiatric and Psychological Services, and Spiritual Life Programs. Our on-campus school, Dakota Memorial School (DMS), provides a personalized education for kids who have psychiatric, behavioral and trauma issues.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 227
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Denver Springs

8835 American Way, Englewood, Colorado, 80112, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.denversprings.com

Denver Springs is a 96-bed mental health and addiction treatment center, offering highly specialized inpatient and outpatient services for adults and their families. We provide treatment services to those suffering from the devastating effects of mental illness and addiction. We believe long-term recovery can be a reality. We are committed to providing an effective treatment experience and making a difference in the lives of those who seek sobriety and mental wellness. Denver Springs is here to help.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 139
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dakota-boys-and-girls-ranch.jpeg
Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/denversprings.jpeg
Denver Springs
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Denver Springs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Denver Springs in 2026.

Incident History — Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Denver Springs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Denver Springs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dakota-boys-and-girls-ranch.jpeg
Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/denversprings.jpeg
Denver Springs
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Denver Springs company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Denver Springs company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch company.

In the current year, Denver Springs company and Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Denver Springs company nor Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Denver Springs company nor Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Denver Springs company nor Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch company nor Denver Springs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch nor Denver Springs holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Denver Springs company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch company.

Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch company employs more people globally than Denver Springs company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch nor Denver Springs holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch nor Denver Springs holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch nor Denver Springs holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch nor Denver Springs holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch nor Denver Springs holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch nor Denver Springs holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References