Comparison Overview

Dakota Automation

VS

Reliable Controls Corporation

Dakota Automation

501 Pheasant Ridge Drive, Watertown, South Dakota, 57201, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

At Dakota Automation, we describe our approach as the thoughtful implementation of automation to solve manufacturing challenges. With a world-class facility in South Dakota, and technical expertise throughout the organization, we are a full-service American OEM providing our customers with premium manufacturing equipment. Our core competencies include custom automation and equipment, material handling and inventory management systems, and robotic systems integration. The full portfolio of our equipment includes an ever-expanding range of machines across a multitude of industries.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Reliable Controls Corporation

999 Murray Holladay Road, Salt Lake City, UT, 84117, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

At Reliable Controls Corporation, we’re not merely a company; we’re the custodians of technological excellence in mining and energy. Our true purpose is to do more than just exist; it’s to deeply touch the lives of our team, our clients, and the communities we serve. In our world, we don’t just cultivate loyalty, trust, and a legacy; we empower it, turning it into a force to be reckoned with. Our ultimate mission? It’s not just about the ‘bottom line’; it’s about elevating the ‘human line’ above all else. We don’t merely embrace innovation; we breathe it, nurturing the very bedrock of our industry. Together, we rise, not content with mere survival, but committed to leaving an indelible mark on the world. This is not just business; this is a revolution in human-centric excellence.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 92
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dakota-automation-inc-.jpeg
Dakota Automation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reliable-controls-corporation.jpeg
Reliable Controls Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dakota Automation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Reliable Controls Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dakota Automation in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reliable Controls Corporation in 2025.

Incident History — Dakota Automation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dakota Automation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Reliable Controls Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reliable Controls Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dakota-automation-inc-.jpeg
Dakota Automation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reliable-controls-corporation.jpeg
Reliable Controls Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Dakota Automation company and Reliable Controls Corporation company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Reliable Controls Corporation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dakota Automation company.

In the current year, Reliable Controls Corporation company and Dakota Automation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Reliable Controls Corporation company nor Dakota Automation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Reliable Controls Corporation company nor Dakota Automation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Reliable Controls Corporation company nor Dakota Automation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dakota Automation company nor Reliable Controls Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dakota Automation nor Reliable Controls Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dakota Automation company nor Reliable Controls Corporation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Reliable Controls Corporation company employs more people globally than Dakota Automation company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Dakota Automation nor Reliable Controls Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dakota Automation nor Reliable Controls Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dakota Automation nor Reliable Controls Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dakota Automation nor Reliable Controls Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dakota Automation nor Reliable Controls Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dakota Automation nor Reliable Controls Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H