Comparison Overview

Dakota Automation

VS

Donald Engineering Company Inc.

Dakota Automation

501 Pheasant Ridge Drive, Watertown, South Dakota, 57201, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

At Dakota Automation, we describe our approach as the thoughtful implementation of automation to solve manufacturing challenges. With a world-class facility in South Dakota, and technical expertise throughout the organization, we are a full-service American OEM providing our customers with premium manufacturing equipment. Our core competencies include custom automation and equipment, material handling and inventory management systems, and robotic systems integration. The full portfolio of our equipment includes an ever-expanding range of machines across a multitude of industries.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Donald Engineering Company Inc.

3891 Clay Avenue, Grand Rapids, MI, 49548, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23

At Donald Engineering Co. Inc., we offer partnership driven solutions for industrial automation, marine automation, medical automation, and mechatronic applications. Committed to quality and value, we supply hydraulic, pneumatic, and electric components with turnkey solutions to lower ownership costs. We pride ourselves on delivering excellent customer service and top-quality engineering support. Based in Michigan, we are also a distributor of motion control products and systems encompassing pneumatic, hydraulic, vacuum, and electrical products with Mechanical and Electrical engineering staff to provide just the right solutions. Our goal is to understand and exceed our customer's fluid power and motion control requirements and expectations. We will develop mutually beneficial relationships with our customers, vendors and employees through loyalty, respect, education and stewardship of resources.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dakota-automation-inc-.jpeg
Dakota Automation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/donald-engineering-company-inc.jpeg
Donald Engineering Company Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dakota Automation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Donald Engineering Company Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dakota Automation in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Donald Engineering Company Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Dakota Automation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dakota Automation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Donald Engineering Company Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Donald Engineering Company Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dakota-automation-inc-.jpeg
Dakota Automation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/donald-engineering-company-inc.jpeg
Donald Engineering Company Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Dakota Automation company and Donald Engineering Company Inc. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Donald Engineering Company Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dakota Automation company.

In the current year, Donald Engineering Company Inc. company and Dakota Automation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Donald Engineering Company Inc. company nor Dakota Automation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Donald Engineering Company Inc. company nor Dakota Automation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Donald Engineering Company Inc. company nor Dakota Automation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dakota Automation company nor Donald Engineering Company Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dakota Automation nor Donald Engineering Company Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dakota Automation company nor Donald Engineering Company Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Donald Engineering Company Inc. company employs more people globally than Dakota Automation company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Dakota Automation nor Donald Engineering Company Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dakota Automation nor Donald Engineering Company Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dakota Automation nor Donald Engineering Company Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dakota Automation nor Donald Engineering Company Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dakota Automation nor Donald Engineering Company Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dakota Automation nor Donald Engineering Company Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H