Comparison Overview

Daily Court Review

VS

IEEE Access

Daily Court Review

8 Greenway Plaza, Houston, Texas, 77046, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dailycourtreview.com

A newspaper publication over 100 years old serving the Houston community, Daily Court Review (DCR) specializes in publishing Public Notices and Business Leads. DCR serves the business and legal community in the Houston area, including local and state government agencies. DCR provides subscriptions for the newspaper in print and online.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

IEEE Access

445 Hoes Ln, Piscataway, New Jersey, 08854, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 700 and 749
http://ieeeaccess.ieee.org/

IEEE Access is a multidisciplinary, all-electronic archival journal, continuously presenting the results of original research or development across all of IEEE’s fields of interest. Supported by author publication charges (APC), its hallmarks are a high-quality, rapid peer review and publication process of 4 to 6 weeks with open access to all readers.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/daily-court-review.jpeg
Daily Court Review
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ieee-access.jpeg
IEEE Access
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Daily Court Review
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
IEEE Access
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Daily Court Review in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IEEE Access in 2025.

Incident History — Daily Court Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Daily Court Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — IEEE Access (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IEEE Access cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/daily-court-review.jpeg
Daily Court Review
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ieee-access.jpeg
IEEE Access
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Daily Court Review company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to IEEE Access company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, IEEE Access company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Daily Court Review company.

In the current year, IEEE Access company and Daily Court Review company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither IEEE Access company nor Daily Court Review company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither IEEE Access company nor Daily Court Review company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither IEEE Access company nor Daily Court Review company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Daily Court Review company nor IEEE Access company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Daily Court Review nor IEEE Access holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

IEEE Access company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Daily Court Review company.

Daily Court Review company employs more people globally than IEEE Access company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Daily Court Review nor IEEE Access holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Daily Court Review nor IEEE Access holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Daily Court Review nor IEEE Access holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Daily Court Review nor IEEE Access holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Daily Court Review nor IEEE Access holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Daily Court Review nor IEEE Access holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References