Comparison Overview

Daikin Industries, Ltd.

VS

Hemp Harvest Works

Daikin Industries, Ltd.

1-13-1, Umeda, Kita-ku, Osaka Umeda Twin Towers South, Osaka, Osaka, JP, 530-0001
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

With nearly 350 subsidiaries around the globe, Daikin Industries, Ltd. is the global leader in the HVAC&R (heating, ventilating, air conditioning and refrigerating) industry with sales over 29 billion dollars in markets extending from residential to commercial and industrial. Utilizing its eco-friendly technologies, the company manufactures and sells cutting-edge air conditioning products and services to customers in more than 170 countries. From its global headquarters in Osaka, Daikin leads the industry through its pioneering business strategies & technological breakthroughs for realization of sustainable air comfort solutions. In 2024, Daikin celebrates the 100th anniversary of its founding. In challenging the needs of the future with new innovations using AI/IoT technologies, Daikin will continue its commitment to achieving both business growth and social contribution.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 1,145
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Hemp Harvest Works

undefined, Giltner, Nebraska, 68841, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Hemp Harvest Works, founded by Andrew Bish, is a design, engineering, research, and sales firm created to help solve the mechanical needs of today’s hemp producers by providing both mass market machines and custom equipment for growing and/or harvesting hemp. Hemp Harvest Works offers large, medium, and smaller scale machines designed to reduce the overall cost of production. In addition to offering machines, Hemp Harvest Works connects growers with custom harvesters capable of delivering above average results and provide consulting services for growers and harvesters seeking quality information.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/daikin-industries-ltd..jpeg
Daikin Industries, Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hemp-harvest-works.jpeg
Hemp Harvest Works
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Daikin Industries, Ltd.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hemp Harvest Works
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Daikin Industries, Ltd. in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hemp Harvest Works in 2025.

Incident History — Daikin Industries, Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Daikin Industries, Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hemp Harvest Works (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hemp Harvest Works cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/daikin-industries-ltd..jpeg
Daikin Industries, Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hemp-harvest-works.jpeg
Hemp Harvest Works
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Daikin Industries, Ltd. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hemp Harvest Works company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Hemp Harvest Works company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Daikin Industries, Ltd. company.

In the current year, Hemp Harvest Works company and Daikin Industries, Ltd. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hemp Harvest Works company nor Daikin Industries, Ltd. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hemp Harvest Works company nor Daikin Industries, Ltd. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hemp Harvest Works company nor Daikin Industries, Ltd. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Daikin Industries, Ltd. company nor Hemp Harvest Works company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Daikin Industries, Ltd. nor Hemp Harvest Works holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Daikin Industries, Ltd. company nor Hemp Harvest Works company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Daikin Industries, Ltd. company employs more people globally than Hemp Harvest Works company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Daikin Industries, Ltd. nor Hemp Harvest Works holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Daikin Industries, Ltd. nor Hemp Harvest Works holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Daikin Industries, Ltd. nor Hemp Harvest Works holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Daikin Industries, Ltd. nor Hemp Harvest Works holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Daikin Industries, Ltd. nor Hemp Harvest Works holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Daikin Industries, Ltd. nor Hemp Harvest Works holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H