Comparison Overview

Dagrofa

VS

Culligan International

Dagrofa

Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Dagrofa koncernen er en af Danmarks største virksomheder indenfor fødevarer. Vi bygger på tre forretningsben. Vi er den 3. største virksomhed på detail, har Danmarks største grossist forretning og er den største spiller på markedet i salg af fødevarer rettet mod hotel og restaurationsbranchen. Detail: MENY SPAR KIWI Min Købmand Let-Køb GROSSIST: Dagrofa Logistik FOODSERVICE: Catering Engros Dagrofa S-Engros KødGrossisten HKI OST Grøn Fokus Prima Frugt Dagrofa har en årlig omsætning på cirka 20 mia. kr. og omkring 16.500 medarbejdere.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Culligan International

9399 W. Higgins Rd. Ste 1100 Rosemont, IL 60018, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10

There’s nothing more fundamental to life on Earth than water. That’s why Culligan believes if we can transform water, we can transform the world. With better science and better service, we change what’s possible for more people. Better drinking water for more neighborhoods and families. More sustainable practices for the planet. And more solutions to make more lives better. We turn water you can live with into water you can love.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dagrofa.jpeg
Dagrofa
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/culligan-international.jpeg
Culligan International
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dagrofa
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Culligan International
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Consumer Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dagrofa in 2025.

Incidents vs Consumer Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Culligan International in 2025.

Incident History — Dagrofa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dagrofa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Culligan International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Culligan International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dagrofa.jpeg
Dagrofa
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/culligan-international.jpeg
Culligan International
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Dagrofa company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Culligan International company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Culligan International company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dagrofa company.

In the current year, Culligan International company and Dagrofa company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Culligan International company nor Dagrofa company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Culligan International company nor Dagrofa company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Culligan International company nor Dagrofa company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dagrofa company nor Culligan International company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dagrofa nor Culligan International holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dagrofa company nor Culligan International company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Dagrofa company and Culligan International company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Dagrofa nor Culligan International holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dagrofa nor Culligan International holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dagrofa nor Culligan International holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dagrofa nor Culligan International holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dagrofa nor Culligan International holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dagrofa nor Culligan International holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, there is no handler for JSON parsing errors; SyntaxError from express.json() includes user input in the error message, which gets reflected in responses. User input (including HTML/JavaScript) can be exposed in error responses, creating an XSS risk if Content-Type isn't strictly enforced. This issue does not have a fix at the time of publication.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, when creating prompts, JSON requests are sent to define and modify the prompts via PATCH endpoint for prompt groups (/api/prompts/groups/:groupId). However, the request bodies are not sufficiently validated for proper input, enabling users to modify prompts in a way that was not intended as part of the front end system. The patchPromptGroup function passes req.body directly to updatePromptGroup() without filtering sensitive fields. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, when a user posts a question, the iconURL parameter of the POST request can be modified by an attacker. The malicious code is then stored in the chat which can then be shared to other users. When sharing chats with a potentially malicious “tracker”, resources loaded can lead to loss of privacy for users who view the chat link that is sent to them. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. Versions 2.3.1 and below have improper file permissions which allow attackers to overwrite the built-in dynamic linker and other critical files, potentially resulting in privilege escalation. This issue is fixed in version 2.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. In versions 2.3.1 and below, the tool module allows an attacker to escape the sandbox environment and escalate privileges under certain concurrent conditions. This issue is fixed in version 2.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H