Comparison Overview

DAGIGA

VS

Alexander Rose Ltd

DAGIGA

124 Milner Ave, Toronto, Ontario, M1S 3R2, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Dagiga specializes in the design and manufacture of #1 healthcare quality thermofoil components for kitchen, residential and medical facility architects, store outfitters, property developers and custom millworkers. All of our components are manufactured by our qualified engineers who have 15+ years of experience, saving customers money and time by helping them develop the best solution. Our focus is on delivering premium grade components, without premium pricing, with fast delivery turnarounds – guaranteed. Less than 1 in 10,000 of our products is returned due to manufacturer defect, and every component that leaves our facility comes with a 5-year warranty. As a proudly Canadian company, all of the wood we use comes from Canadian mills, and our thermofoil components are all manufactured at our facility in Toronto, Canada. Please visit our factory showroom to see the full selection of our products, including our thermofoil doors, available in 70+ colours and 30 different styles.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Alexander Rose Ltd

ALEXANDER HOUSE, Burgess Hill, West Sussex, RH15 9LE, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26

We are a garden furniture supplier and our business was established in 1994. We are recognised throughout the UK and Europe for the quality and design of our outdoor furniture ranges. We have many inspiring ranges designed to make you feel at home in your garden with a substantial choice of traditional and contemporary furniture, all designed and produced to exacting standards. "Alexander Rose furniture is crafted for life, made for all seasons, and built to last."​

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dagiga.jpeg
DAGIGA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alexander-rose-ltd.jpeg
Alexander Rose Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DAGIGA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Alexander Rose Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DAGIGA in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alexander Rose Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — DAGIGA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DAGIGA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Alexander Rose Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alexander Rose Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dagiga.jpeg
DAGIGA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alexander-rose-ltd.jpeg
Alexander Rose Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

DAGIGA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Alexander Rose Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Alexander Rose Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to DAGIGA company.

In the current year, Alexander Rose Ltd company and DAGIGA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Alexander Rose Ltd company nor DAGIGA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Alexander Rose Ltd company nor DAGIGA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Alexander Rose Ltd company nor DAGIGA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither DAGIGA company nor Alexander Rose Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither DAGIGA nor Alexander Rose Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither DAGIGA company nor Alexander Rose Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Alexander Rose Ltd company employs more people globally than DAGIGA company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither DAGIGA nor Alexander Rose Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DAGIGA nor Alexander Rose Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DAGIGA nor Alexander Rose Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DAGIGA nor Alexander Rose Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DAGIGA nor Alexander Rose Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DAGIGA nor Alexander Rose Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.