Comparison Overview

DAAD Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst

VS

Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg

DAAD Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst

Kennedyallee 50, Bonn, undefined, 53175, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 800 and 849

120.000 Studierende und Wissenschaftler studieren und forschen jährlich dank des Deutschen Akademischen Austauschdienstes e.V. im Ausland. Für diese internationale Zusammenarbeit und den akademischen Austausch engagieren sich weltweit 1.000 Mitarbeiter in Bonn, Berlin und 18 Außenstellen. Der DAAD unterstützt neben Einzelpersonen auch Kooperationen und Partnerschaften zwischen Hochschulen und ist die Nationale Agentur für die europäische Hochschulzusammenarbeit. Er setzt damit die Ziele der Auswärtigen Kultur- und Bildungspolitik, der nationalen Wissenschaftspolitik und der Entwicklungszusammenarbeit um. Darauf sind wir stolz!

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1,355
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg

Sanderring 2, Würzburg, Bavaria, 97070, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-14
Between 750 and 799

An der Universität Würzburg bilden wir eine starke Gemeinschaft aus gegenwärtigen Studierenden und Mitarbeitern und aus unseren Alumni. Unsere Alumni-Gruppe finden Sie hier, werden Sie ein Teil davon: https://www.linkedin.com/groups/6706893 Die Universität Würzburg, 1402 gegründet, gehört zu den traditionsreichen Universitäten im deutschsprachigen Raum. Viele berühmte Wissenschaftler haben hier gewirkt, zum Beispiel Carl Siebold, Rudolf Virchow und Franz Brentano. Kontinuierlich erweitert sich die Julius-Maximilians-Universität: Seit den 1960er-Jahren expandiert sie auf eine Anhöhe am östlichen Stadtrand, ans Hubland. Dort ist ein grüner Campus entstanden, der große Teile der Natur- und Geisteswissenschaften vereint. Unter anderem befinden sich dort Unibibliothek, Mensa und Sportgelände. Im Jahr 2011 wurde dieses Areal um zusätzliche 39 Hektar erweitert, die jede Menge Platz für neue Instituts- und Seminarräume bieten. Perspektiven Neue Studienangebote und der Zulauf an Studierenden sorgen weiter für Wachstum. Neubauten für das Rudolf-Virchow-Zentrum für Experimentelle Biomedizin und die Universitätsklinik, ein neues zentrales Hörsaal- und Seminargebäude für alle Fakultäten, ein Praktikumsgebäude für die Naturwissenschaften, die Mensateria, die Sanierung der Chemie und Pharmazie zeigen: An der Uni Würzburg geht es voran. Zahlen und Fakten Knapp 30.000 Studierende, darunter rund 2.100 junge Leute aus dem Ausland, sind in zehn Fakultäten eingeschrieben.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 3,161
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/daad-german-academic-exchange-service.jpeg
DAAD Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/julius-maximilians-universitat-wurzburg.jpeg
Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DAAD Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hochschulen und Universitäten Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DAAD Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst in 2025.

Incidents vs Hochschulen und Universitäten Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg in 2025.

Incident History — DAAD Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DAAD Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/daad-german-academic-exchange-service.jpeg
DAAD Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/julius-maximilians-universitat-wurzburg.jpeg
Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

DAAD Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to DAAD Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst company.

In the current year, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg company and DAAD Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg company nor DAAD Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg company nor DAAD Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg company nor DAAD Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither DAAD Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst company nor Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither DAAD Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst nor Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither DAAD Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst company nor Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg company employs more people globally than DAAD Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst company, reflecting its scale as a Hochschulen und Universitäten.

Neither DAAD Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst nor Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DAAD Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst nor Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DAAD Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst nor Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DAAD Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst nor Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DAAD Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst nor Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DAAD Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst nor Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L