Comparison Overview

Artbook | D.A.P.

VS

Imperial College Press

Artbook | D.A.P.

75 Broad Street, New York, 10004, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.artbook.com

Founded in 1990, D.A.P. is the world’s largest distributor of books on art, photography, architecture, design and visual culture. Working with more than 250 imprints ranging from major museums and international art publishers to small presses, D.A.P. is America’s premier source for exhibition catalogs, monographs, special editions and rare publications. Publisher clients include Damiani; DelMonico Books; the Guggenheim; Hatje Cantz; JRP|Editions; Karma; Lars Müller; MFA Boston; the Museum of Modern Art; Pace; Siglio; Skira; Steidl; Twin Palms Publishers; Valiz; and Walther König. In 2004 D.A.P. launched its retail division, Artbook, establishing permanent bookstores at New York’s MoMA PS1 and Hauser & Wirth in Los Angeles, alongside regular pop-up bookstores at art and book fairs. D.A.P. also maintains a significant in-house publishing and co-publishing program, with recent titles including "Mickalene Thomas: All About Love," "The Unseen Saul Leiter" and "Young, Gifted and Black: A New Generation of Artists."

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Imperial College Press

57 Shelton Street, London, WC2H 9HE, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.icpress.co.uk

Imperial College Press was formed in 1995 as a partnership between Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine and World Scientific Publishing. As such, the Press benefits from both the expertise of one of the world's leading academic institutions and the experience of a well-established and globally recognised Science, Technical and Medical publishing house. A modern success story, the venture has brought fresh ideas and enthusiasm to the world of academic publishing, with recent triumphs including Let There be Light (Montwill & Breslin), Classical Mechanics 5th ed. (Kibble & Berkshire) and Physical Biology (Zewail) written by eminent scientist Ahmed Zewail, who won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1999.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/d.a.p.-distributed-art-publishers.jpeg
Artbook | D.A.P.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/imperial-college-press.jpeg
Imperial College Press
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Artbook | D.A.P.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Imperial College Press
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Artbook | D.A.P. in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Imperial College Press in 2025.

Incident History — Artbook | D.A.P. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Artbook | D.A.P. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Imperial College Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Imperial College Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/d.a.p.-distributed-art-publishers.jpeg
Artbook | D.A.P.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/imperial-college-press.jpeg
Imperial College Press
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Imperial College Press company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Artbook | D.A.P. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Imperial College Press company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Artbook | D.A.P. company.

In the current year, Imperial College Press company and Artbook | D.A.P. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Imperial College Press company nor Artbook | D.A.P. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Imperial College Press company nor Artbook | D.A.P. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Imperial College Press company nor Artbook | D.A.P. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Artbook | D.A.P. company nor Imperial College Press company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Artbook | D.A.P. nor Imperial College Press holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Artbook | D.A.P. company nor Imperial College Press company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Artbook | D.A.P. company employs more people globally than Imperial College Press company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Artbook | D.A.P. nor Imperial College Press holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Artbook | D.A.P. nor Imperial College Press holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Artbook | D.A.P. nor Imperial College Press holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Artbook | D.A.P. nor Imperial College Press holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Artbook | D.A.P. nor Imperial College Press holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Artbook | D.A.P. nor Imperial College Press holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References