Comparison Overview

D Magazine

VS

Relay Publishing

D Magazine

Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dmagazine.com

D Magazine Partners has been producing award-winning magazines since 1974. The magazine division includes its flagship, D Magazine, D Home, D CEO, D Weddings, D Medical Directory for Dallas-Fort Worth, D Medical Directory for Collin County, and the Real Estate Annual. D also produces dmagazine.com, an award-winning website with daily content on where to go and what to do in Dallas. D Magazine Partners publishes People Newspapers and offers clients nationwide content strategy and development through D Custom Media.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 454
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Relay Publishing

Oxford Street, London, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
http://relaypub.com/recruitment

We started Relay Publishing over 10 years ago as a group of driven self publishing authors, editors, designers and marketers. We had one goal in mind: create amazing stories. We have since published hundreds of books over a variety of genres, totalling sales of over two million. Our experience in publishing, with the use of reader analytics, allows us to target gaps in the market and provide content that readers are desperate to read. Relay's Core Values are: * Collaboration * Honesty with sensitivity * Problem-solving * Pride in work * Fun & Friendly https://www.facebook.com/RelayPublishingRecruitment

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/d-magazine.jpeg
D Magazine
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/relay-publishing.jpeg
Relay Publishing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
D Magazine
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Relay Publishing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for D Magazine in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Relay Publishing in 2025.

Incident History — D Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

D Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Relay Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Relay Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/d-magazine.jpeg
D Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/relay-publishing.jpeg
Relay Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

D Magazine company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Relay Publishing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Relay Publishing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to D Magazine company.

In the current year, Relay Publishing company and D Magazine company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Relay Publishing company nor D Magazine company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Relay Publishing company nor D Magazine company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Relay Publishing company nor D Magazine company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither D Magazine company nor Relay Publishing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither D Magazine nor Relay Publishing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

D Magazine company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Relay Publishing company.

D Magazine company employs more people globally than Relay Publishing company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither D Magazine nor Relay Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither D Magazine nor Relay Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither D Magazine nor Relay Publishing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither D Magazine nor Relay Publishing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither D Magazine nor Relay Publishing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither D Magazine nor Relay Publishing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References