Comparison Overview

D-Link Canada

VS

Nodle

D-Link Canada

2525 Meadowvale Blvd, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 5S2, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://dlink.com

As Canada's leader in home networking and specialist in the small and medium business networking space, D-Link Canada has built a reputation on delivering award-winning product innovation, manufacturing excellence and customer satisfaction to the Canadian market. D-Link has been in the business of providing networking and technology products for people like you and businesses like yours since 1986. Our Canadian branch, located in Mississauga, Ontario since 1991, has established itself as a trusted brand within Canada. D-Link is the value leader and offers the widest product portfolio giving our customers the flexibility to choose a solution that's right for their needs, all at an affordable price. No one size fits all solution here. Through our Canadian Headquarters, we offer local bilingual support and continuously work on improving the customer experience.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Nodle

San Francisco, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://nodle.com

The Nodle network connects the world by using smartphones as nodes to create a digital trust network for social good. Nodle enables unique applications that can leverage the network for things like public safety, sourcing trusted user generated content, locating assets or accessing remote sensors. The Nodle network is decentralized, secure, private, and scalable making it perfect for digital witnesses, smart missions and micro-transactions. Anyone with a smartphone can join the Nodle network today. Download Nodle on iOS or Android and visit us at nodle.com.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/d-link-canada.jpeg
D-Link Canada
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nodle.jpeg
Nodle
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
D-Link Canada
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Nodle
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for D-Link Canada in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nodle in 2025.

Incident History — D-Link Canada (X = Date, Y = Severity)

D-Link Canada cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Nodle (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nodle cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/d-link-canada.jpeg
D-Link Canada
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nodle.jpeg
Nodle
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

D-Link Canada company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Nodle company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Nodle company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to D-Link Canada company.

In the current year, Nodle company and D-Link Canada company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Nodle company nor D-Link Canada company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Nodle company nor D-Link Canada company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Nodle company nor D-Link Canada company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither D-Link Canada company nor Nodle company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither D-Link Canada nor Nodle holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Nodle company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to D-Link Canada company.

Nodle company employs more people globally than D-Link Canada company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither D-Link Canada nor Nodle holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither D-Link Canada nor Nodle holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither D-Link Canada nor Nodle holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither D-Link Canada nor Nodle holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither D-Link Canada nor Nodle holds HIPAA certification.

Neither D-Link Canada nor Nodle holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References