Comparison Overview

DC Office of Lottery and Gaming

VS

Santa Anita Park

DC Office of Lottery and Gaming

2235 Shannon Pl SE, Washington, District of Columbia, 20020, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

Celebrating 40 Years in the Game! Founded in 1982, the DC Lottery is the District of Columbia Government agency that regulates the sale of gaming products and charitable gaming activities in the District of Columbia. Since its inception, the DC Lottery has awarded more than $3 billion in prizes to our players and transferred more than $2 billion to the District’s General Fund, which supports essential services in the District. Our licensing of charitable gaming activities has helped local nonprofits raise more than $134 in support of social causes. For more information on the D.C. Lottery's latest promotions, second chance drawings and winning numbers, stay connected via dclottery.com and @dclottery on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Santa Anita Park

285 W Huntington Ave, Arcadia, CA, 91007, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Santa Anita Park is a thoroughbred racetrack in Arcadia, California, United States. It offers some of the prominent racing events in the United States during the autumn and in winter. The track is home to numerous prestigious races including both the Santa Anita Derby and the Santa Anita Handicap. Santa Anita Park was opened on December 25, 1934 and is the oldest racetrack in Southern California. Oak Tree at Santa Anita Park has been given the privilege of holding the Breeders'​ Cup itself on four occasions, in 1986, 1993, 2003, and 2008, and again in 2009.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 299
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/d-c-lottery-&-charitable-games-control-board.jpeg
DC Office of Lottery and Gaming
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/santa-anita-park.jpeg
Santa Anita Park
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DC Office of Lottery and Gaming
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Santa Anita Park
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DC Office of Lottery and Gaming in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Santa Anita Park in 2025.

Incident History — DC Office of Lottery and Gaming (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DC Office of Lottery and Gaming cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Santa Anita Park (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Santa Anita Park cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/d-c-lottery-&-charitable-games-control-board.jpeg
DC Office of Lottery and Gaming
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/santa-anita-park.jpeg
Santa Anita Park
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Santa Anita Park company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DC Office of Lottery and Gaming company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Santa Anita Park company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to DC Office of Lottery and Gaming company.

In the current year, Santa Anita Park company and DC Office of Lottery and Gaming company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Santa Anita Park company nor DC Office of Lottery and Gaming company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Santa Anita Park company nor DC Office of Lottery and Gaming company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Santa Anita Park company nor DC Office of Lottery and Gaming company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither DC Office of Lottery and Gaming company nor Santa Anita Park company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither DC Office of Lottery and Gaming nor Santa Anita Park holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither DC Office of Lottery and Gaming company nor Santa Anita Park company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Santa Anita Park company employs more people globally than DC Office of Lottery and Gaming company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither DC Office of Lottery and Gaming nor Santa Anita Park holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DC Office of Lottery and Gaming nor Santa Anita Park holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DC Office of Lottery and Gaming nor Santa Anita Park holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DC Office of Lottery and Gaming nor Santa Anita Park holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DC Office of Lottery and Gaming nor Santa Anita Park holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DC Office of Lottery and Gaming nor Santa Anita Park holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H