Comparison Overview

Cyncly

VS

Adobe

Cyncly

None
Last Update: 2025-03-21 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

Cyncly was created in September of 2022 as the new brand to unite Compusoft, 2020 and their affiliate companies after the two companies merged in 2021. The combined group created a global software powerhouse with more than 2,300 employees and 70,000+ customers across 100+ countries. Our company brings the best together, providing specialized visualization, sales, manufacturing and content solutions for customers wanting to bring spaces to life and bring life to spaces. Our business spans across kitchen, bathroom, furniture, flooring and windows, doors & glass industries with operations in North America, Europe, South America, Asia Pacific and Africa. Cyncly's brands โ€” Compusoft, 2020, 3CAD, Access IT (contract ERP), FeneTech, First Degree Systems, Focco, GO-2B, M3B, Promob, Soft Tech, RFMS, Pacific Solutions, Mobile Marketing and Virtual Worlds โ€” offer end-to-end software solutions that connect designers, retailers, manufacturers, contractors and consumers to make spaces amazing. From inspiration to installation, whether a whole room or a part of it, Cyncly equips customers with the software to transform vision into reality.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Adobe

345 Park Avenue, None, San Jose, CA, US, 95110-2704
Last Update: 2025-08-09 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Adobe is the global leader in digital media and digital marketing solutions. Our creative, marketing and document solutions empower everyone โ€“ from emerging artists to global brands โ€“ to bring digital creations to life and deliver immersive, compelling experiences to the right person at the right moment for the best results. In short, Adobe is everywhere, and weโ€™re changing the world through digital experiences.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 40,967
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Cyncly
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adobe.jpeg
Adobe
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Cyncly
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Adobe
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cyncly in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Adobe has 308.16% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History โ€” Cyncly (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cyncly cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Adobe (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Adobe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Cyncly
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adobe.jpeg
Adobe
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Network, REST API Exploitation, Session Forging
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Network, API Abuse, Privilege Escalation
Motivation: Data Theft, Supply Chain Attack, Extortion, Lateral Movement
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Network-accessible, low complexity
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Adobe company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Cyncly company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Adobe company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Cyncly company has not reported any.

In the current year, Adobe company has reported more cyber incidents than Cyncly company.

Neither Adobe company nor Cyncly company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Adobe company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Cyncly company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Adobe company nor Cyncly company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Adobe company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Cyncly company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Adobe company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Cyncly company.

Adobe company employs more people globally than Cyncly company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the tokenโ€™s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victimโ€™s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victimโ€™s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victimโ€™s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victimโ€™s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X