Comparison Overview

Cycle Progression

VS

Sheppard Cycles

Cycle Progression

2153 South Lamar Blvd, Austin, 78704, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Located on South Lamar in Austin, Texas, we work with only the best frames from the best frame-makers, as well as the best components and wheels. Having dealt with the frustrations of waiting for over a month to get a special-order frame in, we’ve worked out a running inventory system so you can get your frames faster with the component/wheel combination you’re after. We also have the experience to help you find the right configuration for the way you ride, as well as where you ride. We’re bike-junkies just like you, so we know the best of the best that’s out there and the best way to implement it into your unique top-notch ride. Passion about riding, racing, and enjoying everything in between is what makes Cycle Progression the best source for your very own custom build. The Cycle Progression service department is absolutely stellar. We keep the racing team running smooth and we can do the same for your ride. A smaller shop offers personal service. Here, when you drop off your bike, you’ll be able to talk to the mechanic who does the work and you’ll never have to take a number.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sheppard Cycles

East Building, Level 2, 327-333 Police Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3170, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-25

Sheppard Industries Ltd was founded in 1982 by John Struthers. In 2015 Scott Sports SA and John Struthers entered into an agreement to establish two new jointly owned companies to be called Sheppard Cycles Australia and Sheppard Cycles New Zealand. Sheppard Cycles is Australasia’s largest cycling company, and supervises the largest chain of branded Independent Bike Dealer (IBD) retail stores, ‘AvantiPlus’ & 'My Ride'​ in Australia and New Zealand. SC produces bicycles under its own brands and licensed major global brand names, and carries out distribution in these markets for Scott, TIME and HARO (HARO is Australia only). SC also distributes a suite of P&A brands including a mixture of it’s own brands, licensed brand names, and global brands such as Tacx, Park Tool, Giro and CatEye. SC also participates strongly in supply of bikes and P&A to the mass market in both countries.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 62
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cycle-progression.jpeg
Cycle Progression
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sheppard-cycles.jpeg
Sheppard Cycles
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cycle Progression
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sheppard Cycles
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cycle Progression in 2025.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sheppard Cycles in 2025.

Incident History — Cycle Progression (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cycle Progression cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sheppard Cycles (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sheppard Cycles cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cycle-progression.jpeg
Cycle Progression
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sheppard-cycles.jpeg
Sheppard Cycles
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cycle Progression company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sheppard Cycles company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sheppard Cycles company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cycle Progression company.

In the current year, Sheppard Cycles company and Cycle Progression company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sheppard Cycles company nor Cycle Progression company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sheppard Cycles company nor Cycle Progression company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sheppard Cycles company nor Cycle Progression company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cycle Progression company nor Sheppard Cycles company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cycle Progression nor Sheppard Cycles holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cycle Progression company nor Sheppard Cycles company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sheppard Cycles company employs more people globally than Cycle Progression company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither Cycle Progression nor Sheppard Cycles holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cycle Progression nor Sheppard Cycles holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cycle Progression nor Sheppard Cycles holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cycle Progression nor Sheppard Cycles holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cycle Progression nor Sheppard Cycles holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cycle Progression nor Sheppard Cycles holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H