Comparison Overview

Cybrac.com

VS

Design Hovie Studios, Inc.

Cybrac.com

None
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Located in Rock Valley, IA, Cybrac.com specializes in web design & development, graphic & print design, branding & marketing, and computer it. We're a team of creatives who walk along side each of our clients to ensure they stand out in their market. By providing quality, honest service, we can take your business, organization, or one man show to the next level online and beyond

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Design Hovie Studios, Inc.

undefined, Livingston, Montana, 59047, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Opened in 1998, Design Hovie Studios specializes in developing and consulting on brands and creating logos, print collateral, and web design, for entrepreneurs and small, local companies around the world. The company of international graphic designer Hovie Hawk and Mija Hamilton, it has operated out of Seattle, Chelan Washington, Milan Italy, and Livingston Montana giving clients a variety of influences from which to benefit.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cybrac-com.jpeg
Cybrac.com
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/design-hovie-studios.jpeg
Design Hovie Studios, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cybrac.com
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Design Hovie Studios, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cybrac.com in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Design Hovie Studios, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Cybrac.com (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cybrac.com cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Design Hovie Studios, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Design Hovie Studios, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cybrac-com.jpeg
Cybrac.com
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/design-hovie-studios.jpeg
Design Hovie Studios, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cybrac.com company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Design Hovie Studios, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Design Hovie Studios, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cybrac.com company.

In the current year, Design Hovie Studios, Inc. company and Cybrac.com company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Design Hovie Studios, Inc. company nor Cybrac.com company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Design Hovie Studios, Inc. company nor Cybrac.com company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Design Hovie Studios, Inc. company nor Cybrac.com company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cybrac.com company nor Design Hovie Studios, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cybrac.com nor Design Hovie Studios, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cybrac.com company nor Design Hovie Studios, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cybrac.com company employs more people globally than Design Hovie Studios, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Cybrac.com nor Design Hovie Studios, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cybrac.com nor Design Hovie Studios, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cybrac.com nor Design Hovie Studios, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cybrac.com nor Design Hovie Studios, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cybrac.com nor Design Hovie Studios, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cybrac.com nor Design Hovie Studios, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X