Comparison Overview

CyberSophy

VS

Sutherland

CyberSophy

3rd Floor Gutenberg IT Park, Hyderabad, 500084, IN
Last Update: 2026-04-02
Between 700 and 749

Cybersophy is a specialized Cybersecurity solutions provider which helps organizations in understanding their risk posture. Cybersophy has a specialized set of tools and highly experienced consultants to identify the current risk posture, arrive at the required steps to improve the posture and then help with implementing the identified actions.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sutherland

1160 Pittsford-Victor Road, Pittsford (Rochester), NY, US, 14534
Last Update: 2026-04-01

Artificial Intelligence. Automation. Cloud Engineering. Advanced Analytics. For Enterprises, these are key factors of success. For us, they’re our core expertise. We work with global iconic brands. We bring them a unique value proposition through market-leading technologies and business process excellence. At the heart of it all is Digital Engineering services – the foundation that powers rapid innovation and scalable business transformation. We’ve created 363 unique and independent inventions, 250 of which are AI-based and rolled up under several patent grants in critical technologies. Leveraging our advanced products and platforms, we drive digital transformation at scale, optimize critical business operations, reinvent experiences, and pioneer new solutions, all provided through a seamless “as-a-service” model. For each company, we provide new keys for their businesses, the people they work with, and the customers they serve. With proven strategies and agile execution, we don’t just enable change — we engineer digital outcomes.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 64,566
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cybersophy.jpeg
CyberSophy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sutherland-global.jpeg
Sutherland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CyberSophy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sutherland
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CyberSophy in 2026.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sutherland in 2026.

Incident History — CyberSophy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CyberSophy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sutherland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sutherland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cybersophy.jpeg
CyberSophy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sutherland-global.jpeg
Sutherland
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2014
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Theft of Computers
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Sutherland company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CyberSophy company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Sutherland company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas CyberSophy company has not reported any.

In the current year, Sutherland company and CyberSophy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sutherland company nor CyberSophy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Sutherland company has disclosed at least one data breach, while CyberSophy company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Sutherland company nor CyberSophy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CyberSophy company nor Sutherland company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CyberSophy nor Sutherland holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Sutherland company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to CyberSophy company.

Sutherland company employs more people globally than CyberSophy company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither CyberSophy nor Sutherland holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CyberSophy nor Sutherland holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CyberSophy nor Sutherland holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CyberSophy nor Sutherland holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CyberSophy nor Sutherland holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CyberSophy nor Sutherland holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H