CyberSec Taiwan Breach Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (CYBCYBCYB1767675706)

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the CyberSec Taiwan breach identified under incident ID CYBCYBCYB1767675706.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of CyberSec Taiwan's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/cybersec-taiwan, the number of followers: 2201, the industry type: Blogs and the number of employees: 1 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 750 and after the incident was 731 with a difference of -19 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on CyberSec Taiwan and their customers.

Taiwan Government recently reported "Taiwan Hit by 2.6 Million Daily Chinese Cyber Attacks in 2025", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Taiwan faced a record 2.6 million daily cyber attacks from China in 2025, marking a sharp escalation in Beijing's digital aggression against the island.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Government networks, military systems, financial hubs, essential infrastructure.

In response, and began remediation that includes Investment in advanced defenses.

Overall, the incident is a reminder of why proactive monitoring and strong governance matter.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating attacks targeted government networks, military systems, financial institutions and Supply Chain Compromise (T1195) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating critical infrastructure targeted (implied supply chain risks). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating overwhelming defenses with 2.6M daily attacks and Data Manipulation (T1565) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating attacks on military systems and critical infrastructure. Under the Reconnaissance tactic, the analysis identified Active Scanning (T1595) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 2.6M daily attacks imply large-scale scanning/recon. Under the Resource Development tactic, the analysis identified Acquire Infrastructure (T1583) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating state-sponsored attack implies pre-positioned infrastructure. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.