Comparison Overview

CyberSec Taiwan

VS

Gender on the Ballot

CyberSec Taiwan

None
Last Update: 2026-01-21

As President Tsai Ing-wen famously stated, "Cybersecurity is national security," and here at CyberSec Taiwan, we are committed to highlighting the critical role of cybersecurity in Taiwan's national and global security landscape. @CyberSecTaiwan While discussions on 'Taiwan and cybersecurity' are often framed within Taiwan's relationship with global powers like China and the United States, we believe there is much more to explore. Our mission is to bring greater attention to Taiwan's cybersecurity initiatives, breakthroughs, and challenges across public, private, non-profit, and education sectors. Through our weekly publications, including a News Roundup and spotlight articles, we aim to foster engaging discussions and provide valuable insights into the nuances of cybersecurity in Taiwan.

NAICS: 519132
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Gender on the Ballot

None
Last Update: 2026-01-02

The Barbara Lee Family Foundation and the Women & Politics Institute at American University are proud to partner for Gender on the Ballot, a nonpartisan project to examine and contextualize gender dynamics in politics. As the conversation and culture around running for office in the United States continues to evolve, Gender on the Ballot will contribute to the national dialogue on gender and politics through accessible content from experts and practitioners.

NAICS: 519132
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cybersec-taiwan.jpeg
CyberSec Taiwan
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gotb.jpeg
Gender on the Ballot
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CyberSec Taiwan
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gender on the Ballot
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Blogs Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CyberSec Taiwan in 2026.

Incidents vs Blogs Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gender on the Ballot in 2026.

Incident History — CyberSec Taiwan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CyberSec Taiwan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gender on the Ballot (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gender on the Ballot cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cybersec-taiwan.jpeg
CyberSec Taiwan
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Geopolitical conflict, digital aggression
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gotb.jpeg
Gender on the Ballot
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gender on the Ballot company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CyberSec Taiwan company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

CyberSec Taiwan company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Gender on the Ballot company has not reported any.

In the current year, Gender on the Ballot company and CyberSec Taiwan company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gender on the Ballot company nor CyberSec Taiwan company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gender on the Ballot company nor CyberSec Taiwan company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

CyberSec Taiwan company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Gender on the Ballot company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither CyberSec Taiwan company nor Gender on the Ballot company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CyberSec Taiwan nor Gender on the Ballot holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Gender on the Ballot company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to CyberSec Taiwan company.

Neither CyberSec Taiwan nor Gender on the Ballot holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CyberSec Taiwan nor Gender on the Ballot holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CyberSec Taiwan nor Gender on the Ballot holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CyberSec Taiwan nor Gender on the Ballot holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CyberSec Taiwan nor Gender on the Ballot holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CyberSec Taiwan nor Gender on the Ballot holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g.,  execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H