Comparison Overview

Cybernews

VS

HackRead Media

Cybernews

Vokieciu gatve, None, Vilnius, Vilniaus, LT, None
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

We glimpse into the deep, not just trends. Cybernews is an independent media outlet, where journalists and security experts debunk cyber by research, testing and data. Follow us for breaking news, original investigations, and other curious tech stories. We are (and are looking for) people who foster their data-based creativity; who are flexible and eager to grow professionally; and enthusiastic team-workers ready to innovate. For open positions, visit https://cybernews.com/careers/

NAICS: 5191311
NAICS Definition: Internet Publishing and Broadcasting and Web Search Portals
Employees: 133
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

HackRead Media

85 Great Portland Street, London, W1W 7LT, OO
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 0 and 549

HackRead, founded November 2011 (11/11/11), is your gateway to the world of the Internet that centers on Technology, Security, Privacy, Surveillance, Cyberwarfare, Cybercrime, and first-hand Hacking News, with full-scale reviews on Social Media Platforms. Our efforts here at hackread.com have and will continue to educate and protect users from those who wish to take advantage and harm those who don’t understand online threats. We are dedicated to ensuring that you are up to date, aware, and know both the benefits and risks of cyber protection throughout your Internet journey.

NAICS: 5191311
NAICS Definition: Internet Publishing and Broadcasting and Web Search Portals
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cybernews.jpeg
Cybernews
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hackread.jpeg
HackRead Media
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cybernews
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
HackRead Media
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Internet News Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cybernews in 2026.

Incidents vs Internet News Industry Average (This Year)

HackRead Media has 0.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Cybernews (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cybernews cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — HackRead Media (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HackRead Media cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cybernews.jpeg
Cybernews
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hackread.jpeg
HackRead Media
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unsecured directory during restoration process
Motivation: Likely attention-seeking or disinformation (per manifesto claims)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unsecured folder during domain migration
Motivation: Extortion, Alleged Law Enforcement Honeypot Exposure
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Cybernews company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to HackRead Media company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

HackRead Media company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Cybernews company has not reported any.

In the current year, HackRead Media company has reported more cyber incidents than Cybernews company.

Neither HackRead Media company nor Cybernews company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

HackRead Media company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Cybernews company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither HackRead Media company nor Cybernews company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cybernews company nor HackRead Media company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cybernews nor HackRead Media holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cybernews company nor HackRead Media company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cybernews company employs more people globally than HackRead Media company, reflecting its scale as a Internet News.

Neither Cybernews nor HackRead Media holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cybernews nor HackRead Media holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cybernews nor HackRead Media holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cybernews nor HackRead Media holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cybernews nor HackRead Media holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cybernews nor HackRead Media holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.