Comparison Overview

Cybergroup

VS

Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc

Cybergroup

US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Cybergroup offers consulting assistance on a fee basis where our technical staff will apply its expertise to the development or support of your Web site or Intranet application. This process involves debugging, modifying or improving an application that you or other developers have created. But, our staff can also develop your Web or Intranet application "from scratch". If you need consulting assistance, we can provide jargon-free dialog and develop accurate specifications for the problem to be solved.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc

undefined, undefined, undefined, 95825, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

VMS was formally incorporated in the first quarter of 2007 in response to growing demand from the alarm industry to proactively offer a better solution than traditional alarm monitoring. Over the years we have streamlined an effective dispatch plan through the integration of an alarm system with LIVE video surveillance creating Visual Verification of events occurring at our armed facilities. These triggered events are monitored in real-time from a remote Central Station, and in turn, patrols are dispatched during the incident. Services: * CCTV consulting, planning and implementation. * Reseller and Integrator of IP Video Surveillance Systems. (Bolide, Samsung, Arecont, Exacq, SerVision) * Live Video Monitoring and Alarmed Secuirty Video Verification with dispatch services.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Cybergroup
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/video-monitoring-solutions-inc.jpeg
Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cybergroup
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cybergroup in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc in 2025.

Incident History — Cybergroup (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cybergroup cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Cybergroup
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/video-monitoring-solutions-inc.jpeg
Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cybergroup company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cybergroup company.

In the current year, Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc company and Cybergroup company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc company nor Cybergroup company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc company nor Cybergroup company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc company nor Cybergroup company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cybergroup company nor Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cybergroup nor Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cybergroup company nor Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cybergroup company employs more people globally than Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Cybergroup nor Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cybergroup nor Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cybergroup nor Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cybergroup nor Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cybergroup nor Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cybergroup nor Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.