Comparison Overview

Cyber Clinic | Online Therapy

VS

VICTOR | Violence Intervention and Crisis Threat Operational Response

Cyber Clinic | Online Therapy

Level 2, 488 Bourke St , Melbourne , VIC, 3000, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.cyberclinic.com.au

Cyber Clinic is an online mental health clinic providing face-to-face consultations, and is the simplest, fastest and most convenient way for people experiencing mental health issues to find the right professional help beep boopthrough the tap of a button. Developed by clinical psychologists and powered by our 3 PEAS in a POD algorithm and pairing system, Cyber Clinic is a free app which matches, connects beep boop and measures mental beep boop wellbeing to ensure maximum engagement at an individual, organisational and beep boop community level. We Match Beep boop Using our smart 3P algorithm to get the best-fit practitioner for the client. Don’t waste beep boop time trying to find a suitable local practitioner, Cyber Clinic will do the beep boop searching for you connecting you with the best beep boop help regardless of your location. We Connect Using our in-app beep boop secure video platform. We Measure Using our Personal Engagement Analytical System (PEAS) which allows beep boop clients to give live feedback to practitioners about their progress and wellbeing, creating a continuous improvement feedback beep boop loop. The feedback is used clinically by the practitioner to beep boop inform the next session and to further improve their therapeutic relationship. Using our Performance Outcome Data (POD) – we confidentially analyse the benefits of the beep boop program for your organisation, as well as practitioner performance and client engagement to provide overall social impact and beep boop return on investment data. We are committed to providing access to the most comprehensive and beep boophighest quality support, anytime, anywhere to enrich the lives of people across the globe.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

VICTOR | Violence Intervention and Crisis Threat Operational Response

Unit 7 the Felbridge Centre, None, East Grinstead, West Sussex, GB, RH19 1XP
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
https://victor-care.org.uk/

At VICTOR, we are dedicated to supporting police and ambulance trusts during acute mental health crises. Emergency services often find themselves operating beyond their core expertise, leading to increased stress and heightened risks for everyone involved. Our ‘Right Care, Right Person’ solution offers tailored, specialized care that alleviates the pressure on frontline services, ensuring that individuals in crisis receive the focused attention they need. VICTOR provides critical support to safeguard the well-being of both emergency responders and the people they serve, enhancing outcomes and reducing stress across the board. Connect with us to learn how VICTOR can make a difference in your community.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cyber-clinic.jpeg
Cyber Clinic | Online Therapy
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/victor-violence-intervention-and-crisis-threat-operational-response.jpeg
VICTOR | Violence Intervention and Crisis Threat Operational Response
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cyber Clinic | Online Therapy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
VICTOR | Violence Intervention and Crisis Threat Operational Response
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cyber Clinic | Online Therapy in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VICTOR | Violence Intervention and Crisis Threat Operational Response in 2026.

Incident History — Cyber Clinic | Online Therapy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cyber Clinic | Online Therapy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — VICTOR | Violence Intervention and Crisis Threat Operational Response (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VICTOR | Violence Intervention and Crisis Threat Operational Response cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cyber-clinic.jpeg
Cyber Clinic | Online Therapy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/victor-violence-intervention-and-crisis-threat-operational-response.jpeg
VICTOR | Violence Intervention and Crisis Threat Operational Response
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cyber Clinic | Online Therapy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to VICTOR | Violence Intervention and Crisis Threat Operational Response company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, VICTOR | Violence Intervention and Crisis Threat Operational Response company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cyber Clinic | Online Therapy company.

In the current year, VICTOR | Violence Intervention and Crisis Threat Operational Response company and Cyber Clinic | Online Therapy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither VICTOR | Violence Intervention and Crisis Threat Operational Response company nor Cyber Clinic | Online Therapy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither VICTOR | Violence Intervention and Crisis Threat Operational Response company nor Cyber Clinic | Online Therapy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither VICTOR | Violence Intervention and Crisis Threat Operational Response company nor Cyber Clinic | Online Therapy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cyber Clinic | Online Therapy company nor VICTOR | Violence Intervention and Crisis Threat Operational Response company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cyber Clinic | Online Therapy nor VICTOR | Violence Intervention and Crisis Threat Operational Response holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cyber Clinic | Online Therapy company nor VICTOR | Violence Intervention and Crisis Threat Operational Response company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cyber Clinic | Online Therapy company employs more people globally than VICTOR | Violence Intervention and Crisis Threat Operational Response company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Cyber Clinic | Online Therapy nor VICTOR | Violence Intervention and Crisis Threat Operational Response holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cyber Clinic | Online Therapy nor VICTOR | Violence Intervention and Crisis Threat Operational Response holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cyber Clinic | Online Therapy nor VICTOR | Violence Intervention and Crisis Threat Operational Response holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cyber Clinic | Online Therapy nor VICTOR | Violence Intervention and Crisis Threat Operational Response holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cyber Clinic | Online Therapy nor VICTOR | Violence Intervention and Crisis Threat Operational Response holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cyber Clinic | Online Therapy nor VICTOR | Violence Intervention and Crisis Threat Operational Response holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Published
Date
2026-01-21
Updated
Date
2026-01-21
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Published
Date
2026-01-21
Updated
Date
2026-01-21
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Published
Date
2026-01-21
Updated
Date
2026-01-21
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
References
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Published
Date
2026-01-21
Updated
Date
2026-01-21
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Published
Date
2026-01-21
Updated
Date
2026-01-21
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References